The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1316 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. I think that Tina McCaffery also wanted to comment.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Okay. On the point about prescribing, what would an ideal structure look like for you?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
I would like to ask a bit more about the impact that the bill will have on small, independent or home-based businesses, and how regulation could be designed in a way that improves safety while not creating barriers that would drive people to use unregulated providers.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Will you go into a bit more detail about where that split should be and what the treatment hierarchy is for a certain setting?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
I thank the panel members for coming today. I want to touch on a topic that was discussed in our earlier evidence session. We discussed the tension between a level playing field, so that consumers have confidence that the services are of a certain standard, and managing the barriers to entry for smaller, independent, home-based businesses. What is your view on that balance, and how could regulation be implemented without disproportionately affecting smaller players in the market?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
If there is a difference between Scotland and England, do you think that our legislation could have potential unintended consequences, particularly around driving behaviour underground, into an unregulated space, or to different jurisdictions or even overseas?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Ms Brownlie, you mentioned that certain treatments are not appropriate in certain settings. Could you give us a couple of examples of what you are talking about, for clarity?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 2 December 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. Are there any other views?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Paul Sweeney
My amendments 268 and 278 aim to strengthen the practical framework for administering assisted dying safely and responsibly. The amendments would require the Scottish ministers to publish detailed guidance on what to do if complications were to arise, including on what constitutes a “reasonable period” before death and how to respond to side effects or even failed medication. Without such guidance, clinicians could face serious medical legal risk if problems were to arise during the final stages of the assisted dying process. I believe that, together, the amendments are a reasonable measure to ensure safety and consistency during the most sensitive stage of the assisted dying process.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 November 2025
Paul Sweeney
I will speak to amendments 239, 240 and 241. If passed, those amendments would ensure that the bill works in practice. That means ensuring that doctors feel that they can participate safely and confidently without undue risk of criticism. At present, the bill places a heavy burden on doctors to make all the key judgments about eligibility. The concern of the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland is that that could create a significant legal risk that would deter clinicians from participating at all.
My amendments would create a multidisciplinary panel to act as the final assessor of a patient once the statements from both the co-ordinating and independent doctors have been submitted. That panel would review all evidence, confirm that the person met the criteria, and issue a certificate of eligibility if satisfied that that was appropriate. The intention of my amendments is not to obstruct the bill but to ensure that decisions are consistent and transparent. In effect, the panel would offer a final level of assurance for both patients and clinicians, confirming that all the necessary conditions have been met before assisted dying can proceed.