Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 4 November 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1219 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

On the issue of the general powers, the Cabinet Office’s response says:

“The Retained EU Law Substance review has indicated a distinct lack of subordinate legislation making powers to remove REUL from the UK statute book where appropriate, and if required replace that provision with legislation that is more fit for purpose for the UK.”

It gives a reason for that:

“Had the UK never been a member of the EU, many of the areas identified by the substance review would likely already have similar powers to comparable non EU policy areas to amend. The lack of powers is therefore an oddity created by our EU membership”.

That seems to be saying that the extraordinary situation is that the retained EU law does not provide the same provisions in secondary legislation. Would you agree with that assessment, Sir Jonathan, or perhaps Dr Tucker?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you. I want to probe further on the scenario in which the Government did not introduce replacement legislation. As far as I can see, the Parliament would have no capacity whatever to influence that, and it would not be able to perform any form of scrutiny on the revocation of legislation. There might be a difference if the Government were to introduce replacement legislation, which would perhaps provide a mechanism, but if it were simply to revoke laws through secondary measures, there are no means whatever to scrutinise the impacts.

Do you have a view on that, Sir Jonathan?

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Yes.

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Meeting date: 13 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you for that, Dr Tucker.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Another key point about support from our pharmacy network more generally was about ensuring that people who are released from custody or those who are caring for them if they have a support network are provided with naloxone. The evidence that has been provided has indicated that that is a patchy practice. What is the minister doing to ensure that it is more of a standard protocol?

10:30  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

I have one final question, if I may, convener. A key part of the wider network that supports people being released from custody is referrals to supervised overdose prevention facilities, which were highlighted as a key measure in the reduction of harm while someone is going from a supervised setting to being unsupervised. I am cognisant of the Glasgow pilot on such a facility. Can the minister provide an update on progress with that pilot and on the interaction with local custody settings as a mechanism for referring vulnerable people to it?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

That is very helpful.

I understand that approximately 78 per cent of those who use the disabled bus travel concessionary scheme have a companion allowance, so that seems to be a major aspect of using that scheme.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Do you have any idea of the total number of people who might utilise such a scheme in Scotland? I want to get an idea of the scale of that relative to the overall passenger cohort in Scotland.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

I think that we have that.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 7 December 2022

Paul Sweeney

Yes. Overall, we are talking about 146,000 people. If that is broken down into different components, disabled +1 companions number about 105,000. That is helpful.

A point has been made about bus travel versus rail travel, but a lot of journeys are highly integrated, and people might need to take a bus and then a train. Would the approach help to make it more seamless for people who have a visual impairment to navigate the transport system more generally?