The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1119 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
That is interesting. Have STV and ITV had similar experiences?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
It is just a thought that I had.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
That was an interesting insight, and I want to follow up on one point. What active measures do you take to monitor engagement? Have you seen any trends developing over time? Perhaps you can contrast print media with broadcasting. It is an interesting idea that if you were to front load coverage through the public service broadcasting model, it would then cascade into the commercial side and print media in particular.
09:00Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
In broadcasting, have you seen an evolution in engagement and coverage that might, in the longer term, present an opportunity for the print media?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
So there might be people who would love to spend their days writing about their sport as well as participating in it, but they might not have the opportunity. We could consider whether there were any ways of joining those things up.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
That was really powerful. I know that there is a contrast with Olympic and Commonwealth events, which are quite well resourced. Priyanaz Chatterji, do you have a view on what is happening in cricket? We can bring in other witnesses afterwards.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
That is really powerful; thank you. Lee Craigie, do you have an insight on that from the cycling perspective?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
In the context of cycling being a well-resourced sport, I am thinking of Beth Shriever, who had to crowdfund her way to a gold medal in BMX at Tokyo.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
Thank you for your insights into the quite different economics behind each of the sports. As a follow-up to your points about income and precarity in different sports, what would good look like for you in your particular sport? What would that perfect balance look like? What business model would the sport need to use to achieve that? Do you have any insights as to where it needs to move to? I ask Gemma Fay to kick us off.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Paul Sweeney
I want to reflect on the point that was touched on earlier about Olympic and Commonwealth games. It seems to me that, in many ways, the watershed for British in sport is Atlanta 1996, when we had our worst-ever performance. I think that the UK came 36th in the medal table, with one gold medal and 15 medals overall.
After that, there was a transformation, with the pumping in of lottery funding into those sports. It is fair to say that the funding has been disproportionately targeted at sports that the UK or team GB regard as having the best prospects for medals, so cycling, women’s swimming and athletics achieve the lion’s share of lottery funding or UK sport funding.
Do you see that as having a direct impact on the transformation of societal regard for those sports, particularly with regard to the 2012 Olympic games and the 2014 Commonwealth games? Could sports such as judo benefit from greater investment in that way? Would that security and that focus on excellence and coaching build a performance level similar to that which has been achieved for those other sports? That is improving public perception and increasing engagement with and interest in those sports. Has it created a virtuous cycle for them?
I will start with Eilidh Doyle, because of her background, and it would also be good to hear from the witness with a background in cycling.