The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1214 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
How do you envisage that playing out? We talked about procurement, the opportunity cost of using public expenditure and the demand signal from public expenditure to sustain projects in the community. There is currently a kind of absurdity in the system in which third sector organisations are chasing ever-diminishing grant funding, leading to stress in those organisations. At the same time, vast contractual value is flowing through the system that is perhaps bypassing our communities. If that pound was working harder in a local setting, it could achieve multiple effects, including stability of local community projects, while supplying services. The development of more of a co-operative or social enterprise model could be a virtuous cycle.
That is the kind of discussion that has emerged during today’s evidence sessions. Does the minister have any reflections on that, and on providing underpinning for a community to remove the stress in organisations and the burnout that is often experienced? We often hear about communities and charities that are chasing grant funding and are stressed out about it, while service users are worried about the future of organisations to which they have a connection. There is a disparity between health boards, local authorities and health and social care partnerships, where the turning off and on of projects seems to militate against national objectives. Do you think that the whole process could be more coherent, which could provide better security all round?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
By taking that approach and having different judgments on what constitutes value, do you not risk introducing inequality? In local authorities, I have often seen massive risk aversion, particularly around budgets. I imagine that there is very little appetite to be experimental.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thanks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
Ms Brown, we know that farmers and those in rural communities grow food. How could Scotland’s farm to fork journey be more robustly developed by the third sector, particularly with reference to mental health, wellbeing and a sense of connection to the wider community? Could or should that be more robustly referred to in the plan?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
I wonder about the design of public procurement in all of this. The opportunity cost of public procurement, food behaviour and system design were mentioned earlier. By my rough calculations, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde spent around £24 million on food in 2018. What is the opportunity cost of that? How could we better utilise such expenditure?
Community catering organisations, social enterprises, food pantries and so on are already on a shoestring and are struggling to get grant funding, so surely the social enterprise model would be well served if such vast expenditure were channelled more into the local economy. Do you have any insights into public procurement design and how that could change?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
So that social value demonstrates beneficial mental health outcomes and a public health benefit. How do you capture the opportunity of social value creation in procurement so that it drives behaviour in commissioning and procuring services?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
Professor Jaacks, when you look at mental health and food insecurity from a public health perspective, do you think that those should be more robustly referred to in the plan?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
Could the plan refer more explicitly to the idea of communal dining as a social good? Colleagues touched on procurement. Traditionally, procurement has been preoccupied with cost and quality. Perhaps we could better define social value and how we measure social value. There are ideas about social value being about reducing loneliness or the time wasted in applying for myriad funds, but there are other ways in which we could measure social value so that it demonstrates better value for communities as a whole.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
That is really helpful. Building on what we have heard about the role of the third sector in promoting that sort of activity and how precarious the current financing is for many organisations in the third sector, could there be better and more robust reference in the plan to the interdependencies with the third sector and how an acknowledgment of them could drive delivery within community settings? Does anyone have any insights in addition to what has been said already?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 September 2025
Paul Sweeney
Do you think that the mental health impacts should be referred to more clearly in the plan?