The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1219 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I suppose that what I am asking is whether you are trying to do this through discrete actions rather than as a single move. The proposal has clearly not been met with support from key stakeholders, but could you consider taking forward certain actions through amendment of existing legislation?
09:45Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
During our scrutiny of the draft stage 2 amendments, it was clear from numerous stakeholders that there was an immediate need to pursue concurrent reforms, notwithstanding the passage of the bill. What is the scope of any measures that you are considering to address immediate concerns in relation to a number of factors that stakeholders raised? Those factors include the recruitment and retention of staff; ensuring consistency and equity in the delivery of social care; the complex governance landscape of integration; unmet need; waiting times for assessment; and carers’ right to breaks?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their contributions so far. I want to ask about the definition of “terminal illness”. Section 2 of the bill defines someone as terminally ill
“if they have an advanced and progressive disease, illness or condition from which they are unable to recover and that can reasonably be expected to cause their premature death.”
A number of concerns have been raised by stakeholders about the breadth of the definition and the potential for it to include a wide range of long-term conditions. Some have proposed that the inclusion of a prognostic timescale, such as the timeline of six months in the UK Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, or a wider definition of 12 months, would be an effective means of narrowing the definition.
On the other hand, others have raised concerns that the definition is too narrow and could discriminate against people who are experiencing other non-terminal conditions that nonetheless bring unbearable suffering.
From a clinical perspective, what types of conditions do you think would be covered by the definition of terminal illness in section 2 as currently drafted? What would not be covered? If anyone has any initial desire to respond, please do so.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Does Mr Hazelwood’s point about section 23, which gives power to the Scottish ministers to define guidance or even provide specific regulation on what the qualifying criteria might be, give you some comfort that it could be an evolving situation, and that a better definition could come through secondary legislation?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Might that introduce an inherent bias towards providing assisted dying, as opposed to other options such as palliative care?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you. Do any other witnesses have views on that?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Thank you very much. Are there any final remarks from witnesses, before I conclude?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank the witnesses for their answers so far and will pick up on some points that were raised during last week’s meeting regarding the seniority and specialty of doctors. Are you concerned that the bill is not sufficiently specific about the grade of doctors who would undertake the assessments? Should the bill be amended to define that more clearly?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I also want to ask about the risk of doctor shopping, which is the colloquial expression. There is a concern that, if someone seeks an assisted death and there is a dispute with clinicians, there may be sufficient scope in the bill for people to seek referrals to a point at which they can get what they want, regardless of the concerns that have been raised by clinicians. There does not seem to be provision for any clinician to raise concerns about safeguarding, for example, in respect of that. Do you share that concern, or do you have a view on whether there should be tighter regulations on the nature of referrals and on who does the referring? If there is a need for a second opinion, should the initial clinician, if they are minded to grant the request for assisted dying, be able to refer onwards to someone who might be in agreement, or should it be more neutral, or more regulated?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Is that the idea of having an ethics panel, or some sort of central register, as defined in the bill? Would that be a more satisfactory structure for you?