The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1153 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
The financial memorandum to the bill estimates that there will be 25 assisted deaths in the first year, rising to 400 deaths by year 20. That is also based on an assumption that 33 per cent of people who enter the process will not proceed. Do those projections seem like a workable caseload?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I turn to the issue of capacity, which we have discussed to some extent already. Does either of you have any concerns about the ability of non-psychiatric doctors to assess the capacity of people seeking an assisted death?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I thank our witnesses for joining us this morning.
I want to begin with the crossover or interface between mental and terminal illness. The bill, as introduced, states that, to be eligible for assisted dying, the person must have the mental capacity to make the request for an assisted death. Included in the definition of capacity is that a person should not be
“suffering from any mental disorder which might affect the making of the request”,
with “mental disorder” defined under section 328 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 as
“any ... mental illness ... personality disorder; or ... learning disability”.
How common is it for people facing the end of their lives to be suffering from mental health problems such as depression and anxiety?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Are you concerned that “mental illness”, as defined in the 2003 act, would be a disqualifying criterion?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
To what extent are you satisfied that the process set out in the bill adequately facilitates what is needed to assess an individual’s capacity to seek assisted dying? Are you content that the bill as introduced has sufficient definitions of a process and the safeguards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Your view is that the language should be strengthened to place an obligation.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
I presume that, if there were such strengthening of language in the bill, extra demand would be placed on psychiatry services in Scotland. What is your assessment of the impact that that would have on the psychiatry workload in Scotland. How practical might that be?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
That is helpful. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Would you like the Scottish bill to be amended along the lines of what is drafted in clause 4 of the UK bill, to insert that explicit requirement?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2024
Paul Sweeney
Section 22 of the bill, which is about the limitations of the bill, refers to the
“regulation of the health professions”
and to reserved competence. Is there an implication there for the regulation of medical professions?