The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1219 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
In that case, I thank the panel for coming in and answering our questions so thoroughly this morning. It is much appreciated.
I briefly suspend the meeting for a changeover of witnesses.
10:38 Meeting suspended.Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Are there any other opinions on that provision?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
In that case, it seems that there is dissent in the committee and I understand that you wish to press that to a division, Gillian. I will put the question and members can indicate verbally whether they are content.
The question is, that members are content for the committee to write to the Scottish Government indicating approval of its proposal to consent to the proposed UK statutory instrument. Are we agreed?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
We continue our scrutiny of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill with a second panel of witnesses, who are from organisations that are opposed to assisted dying. I welcome Dr Miro Griffiths, disability studies scholar at the University of Leeds, who is representing Not Dead Yet UK; Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive officer of Care not Killing; Michael Veitch, policy officer at Christian Action, Research and Education for Scotland; and Dr Gillian Wright, director of Our Duty of Care. Thank you all for coming. We will move straight to questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
The next item on our agenda is to take evidence from two panels of witnesses as part of our scrutiny of the Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. By virtue of rule 12.2.3(a), Liam McArthur is attending as the member in charge of the bill and I welcome him to the meeting.
We begin today’s scrutiny of the bill by taking evidence from organisations that are in support of the bill. I welcome to the committee Dr Gillian MacDougall, who is a trustee of Friends at the End; Professor Gareth Morgan, who is convener of the Scottish Christian Forum on Assisted Dying; Fraser Sutherland, who is chief executive officer of the Humanist Society Scotland; and Alyson Thomson, who is director of Dignity in Dying Scotland. We move straight to questions.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Would panel members support the inclusion of additional safeguards for younger people, such as a requirement to undergo a specialist paediatric psychiatric assessment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you, minister, for attending. We will now move on to agenda item 2. You are, of course, welcome to leave at this point or you can stay to watch the rest of the proceedings.
Under this agenda item we will formally consider, in the light of the evidence that we have just heard, the type 1 consent notification sent by the Scottish Government relating to the Food and Feed (Regulated Products) (Amendment, Revocation, Consequential and Transitional Provision) Regulations 2025.
If members are content for consent to be given, the committee will write to the Scottish Government accordingly. If that is the agreed approach, we will have the opportunity in the letter to raise any related questions or concerns or to ask to be kept up to date on relevant developments. However, if members of the committee are not content with the proposal, the committee may choose to make one of the three recommendations that are outlined in paragraph 13 of the clerk’s note.
I invite comments from members of the committee in the light of the evidence that we have just heard.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I echo the sentiments expressed by colleagues. The session last week was very effective. I certainly learned a lot from it, and I am sure that colleagues did, too. A perspective that I had not previously considered was the impact on young people of having a supportive structure around them, then, when they transition to adulthood, perhaps having that support removed. That might influence people’s outlook on life.
Similarly, there are issues around self-administration for people with significant disabilities. A number of interactions really helped me to understand the practical application of the bill as currently drafted. I appreciate that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 January 2025
Paul Sweeney
I thank the members of the panel for their contributions so far.
I turn to section 15 of the bill, on provision of assistance. Assistance is defined as
“providing the substance to end the person’s life, staying with the adult until they have decided they wish to use the substance or, removing the substance if they decide they do not wish to use it.”
The bill does not explicitly provide that the substance would have to be self-administered, but self-administration is stressed in the policy memorandum and explanatory notes.
As part of its written submission, MND Scotland has referred to its concern about whether the bill is sufficiently clear in relation to whether people with physical disabilities—with, for example, a progressive condition such as MND—who would find self-administration difficult or impossible, would have access to assistance. I wonder whether Susan Webster would start us off with concerns about the definition of “assistance”.