Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1219 contributions

|

Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee

Instruments subject to Made Affirmative Procedure

Meeting date: 1 March 2022

Paul Sweeney

I note the concerns that have been raised by colleagues and I have some sympathies with the point about superfluous provisions that are highly unlikely to be used, which means that there are questions about whether it is essential include them in the SSI. That opens up a wider discussion about quality assurance in such legislation, which we have to consider, bearing in mind the committee’s recent report. However, on the balance of probabilities, I do not think that it is a major risk if we permit the provisions to continue for another six months.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

I concur. I recognise that some of the issues are being raised in casework, and the petitioner has identified a valid public need to investigate the issue further, so I am content with the suggestion that we continue the petition.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

That is helpful. What do you hope that the Government formally giving an apology would achieve?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

I am impressed by the body of evidence that the committee has gathered already. We hear a consistent refrain from stakeholders that the change would not necessarily impinge on reserved benefits and that there is a mechanism that can achieve the reform that the petitioner is advocating for.

Having corresponded with some of the stakeholders, I think that although they welcome that the review will take place, there is still concern about its pace. There is also a question about what role this committee should take in the review. Should the committee continue to seek evidence? Should the review refer to that evidence? Should the committee itself make a submission to the review, based on the evidence that we have gathered?

I suppose that the question is not whether the review will take place—it will, and that is a welcome development—but whether the committee has a role or locus in it, whether we should make a submission and whether we are required to keep the petition open in order to do so. That is what we need to consider.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you very much for that. The esplanade of Edinburgh castle has been mentioned. What are your reflections on that? That might be an obvious location, I suppose.

It might be worth considering engaging with Historic Environment Scotland, which manages a lot of historic properties across the country, many of which might, historically, have had some involvement in the practice of witch hunts, and it might be able to find an appropriate location. Therefore, it might be worth engaging in that discussion now to develop the idea.

10:45  

I have been involved in a couple of memorial campaigns, including the Remember Mary Barbour campaign in Glasgow to raise a statue to Mary Barbour and the rent strikers in Govan. That was community led—there was a lot of persistent fundraising and a design competition, but they had to be very much driven by the campaign. Similarly, there is the recent an gorta mór memorial in the east end of Glasgow to the Irish famine victims. Again, that involved a persistent, community-led campaign. Often, such initiatives can help to drive projects, so it might be worth looking at those examples in order to help to drive things forward.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

Thank you for your impressive testimonies.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

With regard to the proposal for a national monument, which I find really interesting, are there any international examples that we can look at? You mentioned a community memorial in the north of Scotland, but are there any well-done international examples of national memorials to the victims of this superstitious practice?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

Would you prefer a verbal apology in the parliamentary chamber rather than something written, or would you rather have both?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

I am happy to follow this up in writing once I have reflected on it, and I am sure that the petitioner, too, will have some ideas.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 February 2022

Paul Sweeney

You have talked about the symbolism of international women’s day. Is there a specific figure in the Government whom you would wish to issue the apology, or would it be satisfactory for the Government in general to do so?