The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 895 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:How much of the increase in appeals and in cases overall is a result of certain individuals putting in more, rather than the wider public becoming more attuned to using FOI?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:Is that partly because of the way in which the system was designed? I sit and figure out how to word what it is that I am looking for, but it is then perhaps difficult to look at my request because authorities think, “Where is she going with this?”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:My concern is about where there should be intervention from legislation or policy to tighten up what can be done. There are legitimate uses of those tools, but AI also opens us up to the potential of people overwhelming public authorities on purpose, whether that is local people or people from further afield.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:The numbers alone kind of answer this, but is there a risk that a new backlog will appear?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:On the soft limit of five, you mentioned exceptions. What type of exceptions would you consider?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:How good are public bodies at discerning whether a request is vexatious or just difficult to deal with?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:You mentioned dealing with interlinked cases and being a bit smarter about them. Are particular themes emerging in the appeals that come through to your office?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:So, you are thinking case by case whether it is legitimate, rather than thinking about the person, such as a journalist or an MSP, and why they might have multiple open cases.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
I want to ask about appeals. I know that the number of appeals is still roughly proportionate to the number of requests that are coming in, but, as you were saying, that is increasing exponentially. What arrangements does the office have in place for monitoring incoming cases and appeals, and how are you managing the overall demand from appeals?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Emma Roddick
:Yes. I can empathise with that situation entirely. With a lot of casework that MSPs get, the trick is trying to figure out whether it is a constituent who did not feel confident drafting something themselves—that might also be the case in the example that you gave, and that seems like a legitimate use of AI—or whether it has just been created by AI. How do you navigate that and figure out whether something is a legitimate request that somebody needed help drafting? How do you decide whether the person wants the information and it is a fair ask of the organisation, or whether it is not even a real person and nobody needs the information?