Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 756 contributions

|

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Emma Roddick

Good morning, minister. You touched on the need for increases to disability and carers benefits to be linked to the UK rate. Do you believe that the UK Government should be uprating those benefits, which would, in turn, allow the Scottish Government to do the same?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Case Transfer

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Emma Roddick

Minister, it is possible that, after the case transfer, people who are currently on DLA might not end up staying on ADP. Do you think that that situation will be uncommon? Where it happens, will the data be monitored so that we can get a full picture of why it has happened and consider whether any changes to support or criteria should be made in the future?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Case Transfer

Meeting date: 31 March 2022

Emma Roddick

Yes, that was helpful—thank you.

10:00  

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Medium-term Financial Strategy and Resource Spending Review Framework

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Emma Roddick

My first question is about child poverty. We expect that, by reducing child poverty, we will create budget savings in other areas, but it is hard to solidly link underspends or reductions in spend elsewhere to a reduction in child poverty. Can you suggest ways in which we can monitor those effects as effectively as possible? How can we evidence knock-on effects and evaluate success on that level?

My other question is about the fiscal framework review. It is fair to say that a hybrid social security model comes with a lot of challenges. We hear a lot about the limitations on future planning because of the threat of changes to the block grant, the extra costs of diverging from UK policy and so on. Does having a hybrid reserved and devolved social security system make financial sense? Can we ever protect the social security budget from risks effectively while we are so intrinsically tied to UK policy decisions?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Medium-term Financial Strategy and Resource Spending Review Framework

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Emma Roddick

On the topic of budget scrutiny, is it more important for those of us who are tasked with scrutinising social security to make use of the medium-term financial strategy than it is for other committees?

I direct that question to Emma Congreve.

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Department for Work and Pensions (Devolved Social Security)

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Emma Roddick

It is good to meet you virtually, minister. Thank you for giving us your time this morning.

My question is very much along the same lines as that of my colleague Pam Duncan-Glancy, but I would like a bit more clarity on policy change. You said that you agree that no further changes to ADP are possible at this time, and that that will be for the Scottish criteria in future. Do you appreciate that although there has been devolution of some social security powers, there are limits to those powers? We are not yet entirely clear on where those limits are or on what can be done without risking the eligibility of claimants of devolved benefits to continue to receive their reserved benefits. Is it your intention to reconcile that and to facilitate the Scottish Government’s policy wishes on devolved benefits?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Department for Work and Pensions (Devolved Social Security)

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Emma Roddick

In a previous response, Andrew Latto advised that further costs that are associated with changing eligibility, due to more disabled people being eligible, would result in the Scottish Government being charged for the difference. If it is your intention, as you say, to get disability benefits to all who need it, should the DWP not be leading on changing eligibility to make sure that that happens with reserved benefits, rather than punishing the Scottish Government for doing so?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Department for Work and Pensions (Devolved Social Security)

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Emma Roddick

Thank you for your patience with my IT. I wanted to come back in on two points. First, on the issue that we have, while I appreciate the—[Inaudible.]—to move emphasis and resources because of the pandemic. I note that in a previous response—[Inaudible.]—rather than punishing the Scottish Government for doing so?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Department for Work and Pensions (Devolved Social Security)

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Emma Roddick

I have certainly noticed some difficulties in a Scottish context to do with the hybrid nature of social security at this point. Is the DWP also struggling with the hybrid nature of social security? Do you think that there will be a need to increase devolved powers in the future, to remedy some of the issues that we have covered this morning?

Social Justice and Social Security Committee

Domestic Violence and Violence Against Women and Girls

Meeting date: 3 March 2022

Emma Roddick

I was initially going to direct my question to Eilidh Dickson, but she has covered the issue already, so I will direct it to Marsha Scott and see whether Eilidh Dickson wants to come in afterwards.

I note from the statistics in our papers that, during the time period stated, disabled women were almost twice as likely to have experienced sexual assault compared with non-disabled women, and that, globally, 90 per cent of women with learning disabilities have been subjected to sexual abuse. In previous evidence sessions, the committee has heard how much more likely it is that refugees and asylum seekers, particularly those with no recourse to public funds, will experience sexual assault and violence.

What is lacking in the support or the policy that is aimed at preventing or reducing the high levels of sexual assault experienced by women with intersecting characteristics?