The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 756 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Okay. I can probably say no more than I did in my previous question with regard to our needing to be able to scrutinise what is going on and what the options are. From the Government’s point of view, does a decision on the SSI require to be made today?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
How far in advance of the issuing of section 114 notices down south was there concern that that point might be reached? What were the warning signs that could have been spotted?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Participatory budgeting is a way for communities to feel that they have a stake in council budgeting decisions, but those who are not in the majority can be missed when it comes to decisions on where investment, or progress on the realisation of rights, may be required. How should councils engage with a community without allowing minority voices to be overshadowed?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Are lessons being learned or looked at here, in response?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Yes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
You have spoken about warning signs being evident years in advance. Rumours and low-level concerns about financial decisions must exist pretty much all the time. When should councils begin to worry and take action? Does the response need to be more specific and geared towards the current example, rather than just having generalised worry about specific practices?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
On notices and the lead-up to them being issued, is that likely to lead to change to accounting guidance practices or legislation?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Tough decisions are having to be made across the public sector, and that undoubtedly means that some very worthy causes are not getting as much money as we would like them to get, or that money is having to be moved from something that requires investment if it is going to cause change. When councils are having to make those tough decisions, is there enough communication from them on why decisions are being made and how long the situation is expected to be that way for the group or the issue in question?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Good morning. Can the commission point to any examples of good practice in community engagement in budget decisions?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Emma Roddick
Good morning. I want to pick up on COSLA’s comment that
“the timing of the response and related messaging has contributed to conflation between the SLARC recommendations and ongoing pay negotiations for our workforce, which is adding to a negative perception of the councillor role.”
Could you go into a bit more detail about why that comment was made?