Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 631 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

The witnesses have mentioned consensus and common goals as examples of cross-party working, but does good cross-party working require agreement?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

I was about to ask her.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

Members of the public often claim that they really like to see cross-party working, particularly in committees. The ability for us to do that depends very much on the culture. How do we foster a culture that allows and facilitates cross-party working?

10:00  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

I suppose that a lot of things could be borrowed from Wales. For example, the cube root rule is probably applicable to both legislatures.

I am keen to ask about what witnesses have said about clerking and research resources. The effectiveness of such resources depends on MSPs using them and understanding how to use them. How do you suggest that we get around that issue?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Interests

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

Good morning, convener. I am very excited to be here. A relevant interest in my entry in the register is that I was a Highland councillor until May 2022.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

Absolutely.

That brings me to my next question. Here, in the Scottish Parliament, about a third of members sit on multiple committees. What is your take on how effective members can be when their time is split across various policy areas, particularly when, for example, they might sit on two committees in which the subject matter is legislation heavy or detailed? Might there be ways around that?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

It is interesting that you referred to the expertise of another committee. Is there enough training for members of committees, or is it more a case of just hoping that, if somebody is a member for long enough, they will pick up enough about the policy area to be an expert?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]

Committee Effectiveness Inquiry

Meeting date: 24 April 2025

Emma Roddick

I was going to bring you in on the problem of there being too few people. In the Scottish Parliament, between a quarter and a third of MSPs are members of the Government so, if the Scottish Parliament pursued the same ratio that the Senedd is introducing, we would need to have 175 MSPs. I am keen to get your view on the order in which we should look at things. Should we say, “There are 129 MSPs, so how big should committees be?” or, “This is how big committees must be in order to be effective, so this is how many MSPs there should be”?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Emma Roddick

In the previous evidence session on the bill, I asked about victim impact statements and whether that would be the natural next step with regard to which crimes should be captured by such a provision. Do you have a view on that? I imagine that you come across lots of different crimes in relation to which it is suggested that the victim should be able to say their piece.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 23 April 2025

Emma Roddick

You have guessed my next question, because I was going to dig into the definition a little bit more.

What are your views on what happens if the aggravation is applied but the dog that is stolen does not fall within that specific definition although the person who is stealing it believes that it does?