The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 772 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
At the moment, the process for filling a vacancy on the regional list is very different. Both the party and the person who was next on the list would have to produce a certificate to say that they were happy that that person was the candidate. Is it clear whether the bill as drafted completely circumvents the need for a nominating officer certificate? Could we be in a position in which a region-wide ballot is held and the recalled MSP supported but the party does not produce a certificate and that person is not re-elected?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
That is interesting. Thank you. We had some discussion with the previous panel of witnesses comparing what happens currently with vacancies on a regional list with what would happen in the case of a recall. Normally, a written statement would be needed from the candidate to say that they wished to take up the seat, along with the party’s certificate of nomination. Malcolm Burr suggested that the way to simplify that process would be to require by provision that a party must produce that certificate if a recalled MSP was supported in a regional poll. What is your view on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
They might not be a member of the party.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Fair enough.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Finally, from an education perspective, I wonder how easy it would be for people to understand what they were looking at in a regional poll. In a constituency recall election, the recalled MSP could well be standing as an independent or for a different party from their original party. However, with a regional ballot, where the choice would be between that candidate and somebody else who was unnamed, it would all become very party specific. Do you think that people would understand that, if a Conservative regional member was involved, they would not be voting against the Conservatives but would be voting for that person or for someone else?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
We can see that, in the case of somebody being recalled, it is very likely that there would be questions about whether they have fallen out with certain people or whether the party really wants them to be a representative. Given that the electorate would have made what Malcolm Burr called a “positive choice”, it seems that requiring the party to certify the person is the right way to go, but would that bring the party’s rights into question?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Sarah, can you go into more detail on the concerns that you raise in your written submission with regard to regional polls?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Of course. It is unclear at the moment whether a party could still refuse to give a certificate of party candidate nomination to a recalled regional MSP if they were supported in a regional poll. Malcolm Burr suggested that the party should be required to do that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Emma Roddick
Essentially, it would be really difficult to design a recall system that worked for both first past the post and a proportional representation system at the same time. Given that that is the voting system that we have in Scotland, is there some other way of doing it? We keep talking about parity between regional and constituency MSPs, but the fact is that we are here for different reasons, so should the recall look different for the two kinds of MSP?