The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 772 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
It was suggested for possible secondary legislation later on, but it is not in this order.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Should the less prescriptive approach to the tactile devices help with people’s ability to offer the support that the voter needs, rather than an assumption of what they need?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Good morning. I have a few questions about accessibility changes. The main change relates to the requirement about the detailed description of the tactile voting device. Will you provide an update on preparations to allow for the training that will need to be in place for those who will be assisting disabled voters to take part in the election?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Presumably, in the overnight period between the election and the count, staffing and security are required, with leisure centres, for example, being monitored. I assume that the media sit there waiting for something to report, regardless of whether counting is going on. Would that not add to the cost?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Okay, but the cost of the security would be someone else’s rather than—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
There are other related issues that have not made it into this order, although I understand there will still be conversations about what is needed in future. For example, there are concerns about one person being able to help more than two disabled voters, and that concern about undue influence or control surely exists for postal voting, too, particularly in places such as care homes. Is enough being done to protect disabled postal voters?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Indeed, and I guess that there might be similar residential situations in households where there is a power centre. I know that there have been conversations about free mailings and whether there should be just one mailing to each household instead of candidates being able to send things out in stages to different household members. Is there a concern about equalities issues in that respect, too?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
Finally, with the order as laid out, do you still have any critical accessibility concerns?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 September 2025
Emma Roddick
The security of the boxes overnight—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 September 2025
Emma Roddick
I want to pick up on some of the comments and tease out whether people believe that there is an inherent conflict between food production and looking after nature and climate. Or is the nuance missing from how we discuss these things and take them forward? Loads of farmers in the Highlands and Islands are doing incredible things and taking an active role in what is happening in the environment around them, as well as on their farms specifically.