The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5060 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I believe that various organisations, such as the Electoral Reform Society, are working on citizens assemblies.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much for that.
We have gone over time. I feel that it will be frustrating if we have this conversation next year. What has happened to the local government review that was in train but seems to have been lost in the weeds somewhere, and the “Democracy matters” process? Were they not about the third sector, local government and national Government trying to take the crowd with them? That was the process, but was it useful? Do we need to find the fire in that again or is it time to do something else? It feels as though we keep doing those reviews. As we have heard today, we keep writing different papers.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I will bring you in at the end, Mark.
We move on to the issue of public service reform, although I know that we have already started to touch on that, and the Verity house agreement. I will bring in Miles Briggs, to be followed by Colette Stevenson and Mark Griffin.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
That is very helpful. That concludes our questions. Many thanks to the witnesses for joining us this morning and for your useful contributions. Let us hope that we can talk about something very different 12 months from now—that would be great.
As the committee previously agreed to take the next three items in private, and that was the final public item on our agenda for today, I now close the public part of the meeting.
11:33 Meeting continued in private until 12:34.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 1 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
The second item on our agenda is to decide whether to take in private items 4 and 5. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ariane Burgess
I was about to ask whether we could be reassured that there was a budget line for the plan.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ariane Burgess
I appreciated Christine Grahame’s line of questioning, which I found very useful.
At the round table with stakeholders, which was very useful, the stakeholders spoke about the importance of investment in and resourcing of regional fisheries governance and co-management structures. We heard from a number of people, so I will use a couple of examples to give a flavour of that.
We heard from Alastair Hamilton, who is a representative of the regional inshore fisheries groups network. He said:
“More local control would get community buy-in and increase compliance, because what is happening would be known, as opposed to what we have at the moment with the remote service.”
Dr Cook said:
“In America, they ensure that the evidence on which the management is predicated is shared so that, instead of presenting people with an assessment of scientific evidence and saying, ‘We’re going to do this—what do you think?’, they go in at a lower level where the industry itself is involved in preparing the evidence on which the management decisions are made. As a result, they get much more buy-in to the whole process.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 4 September 2024; c 37, 50.]
I would be interested to hear what work is being done by the Scottish Government to review the existing regional networks, including by looking at co-management models in other jurisdictions to inform potential reform of regional fisheries management in Scotland. I add that we also heard about the fisheries management and conservation group and the sub-groups, and about the degree of frustration with the lack of movement in some of those sub-groups.
I am asking about co-management models and whether there is scope to increase investment and provide more local powers to support fisheries co-management. We have also been made aware of the models—I think that they are called inshore fisheries and conservation authorities—in England, which are based out of local authorities and have more of a focus on local control.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ariane Burgess
What is the timescale for the call for evidence on looking at different models?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ariane Burgess
Before I move on, I will stay on the theme of co-management and collaboration. It is important that the Government is looking at that work, because there are so many different fora, such as FMAC, RIFGs, national marine plans—and something else, I think. It is a very confusing landscape for people to engage with and know where they can go to get their voice heard.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 25 September 2024
Ariane Burgess
Finally, I am interested in understanding why the Scottish Government chose to spend money on appealing the Open Seas judicial review. That non-governmental organisation, and others, are concerned that it is trying to hold the Government to account for its obligations, and Open Seas won. Why is the Government not carrying out its obligations rather than spending money on appeals?