The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5060 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
We turn to the final negative instrument. If members have no comments to make about the building regulations, is the committee agreed that we do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Okay, thank you.
We move on to questions on the national planning framework.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful. We have brought in the national planning framework, which is putting biodiversity right up there. I know that it is early days and it is still bedding in, but I see that we have problems at a local level with attending properly to biodiversity. I am hearing about situations in which councils are continuing with old practices around biodiversity that need to disappear. One of my concerns about the masterplan consent areas is that we would have an overarching EIA—although I hear your point that it gets triggered only if certain projects are to occur within that masterplan consent area—but we are not seeing best practice come through around biodiversity.
We could create a situation where we do that blanket EIA and then, down the line, realise that we missed something within that context. Do you see what I mean? I am talking in the abstract—I do not have a specific example because we are in an abstract situation as we start to understand more about our impacts on biodiversity.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I have a question about having to pass the SSI 40 days before 1 January if we do not pass it today. Would passing it today mean that you could just get on with things? If it were not passed, would you be prevented from doing so? I think that we have until 22 November or something. If we wanted to delay the regulations, take more evidence and get some more understanding, would that halt you? Would it create a barrier and prevent you from moving forward, or would you be able to move forward and get some more systems in place to ensure that things rolled out smoothly on 1 January?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
This flowchart that I have is the route map.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Are you able to say what kind of reporting package will come with it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I come back to the commitment to co-design. We talk a lot about ARIOB, but our papers say that the Government
“refers to its commitment to co-design those new schemes and will continue to engage with stakeholders through mechanisms including the ARIOB, wider Agriculture Reform Programme and during the passage of secondary legislation”.
Will you explain to us what the agriculture reform programme is so that we can understand it a bit more? How are you engaging with people through it? Is that what you talked about?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Can you give us an indication of what other things you could be getting on with? I know that you are meeting people, but are there specific chunks of work that might be coming our way or something like that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Without rehashing anything that has already been brought up, my understanding is that the SSI is required to continue the SRDP payments, but it has also flagged up and brought to light the issue of the rebasing of LFASS. It has, in fact, provided a great opportunity, because we now see that people are concerned about LFASS.
I understand from reading the policy note that, in relation to the SRDP, you have not provided for reporting to 2030 because the rural support plan is coming in. The policy note says that the reporting requirement
“has not been extended until 2030, as reporting of legacy CAP schemes”—
which are all the things that we are talking about, such as LFASS, the agri-environment climate scheme and the forestry grant scheme—
“is a requirement of Rural Support Plan reporting in the ARC Act.”
Therefore, there is no need to report under the SRDP because the reporting will fit in under the rural support plan. Is the SRDP on a parallel with the rural support plan, or will it get tucked inside it, with reporting continuing in that way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 9 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
We definitely need some diagrams as we go forward with the programme.
The rebasing of LFASS was also flagged up. As you pointed out, the route map talks about LFASS continuing until 2026, and then it says that
“Engagement”
will be
“required with farmers and crofters on how this type of support will be delivered from 2027”.
Will you wait until that point to start addressing that or, because of the issue that has been raised, is it time to bring that work a bit further forward in your schedule? It seems like people are concerned about it.