The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5987 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thanks for taking part in this session. Clearly, we could talk to you for a lot longer on this. We are just scratching the surface.
My question is about process. Your consultation will end at the end of March, as you said. What happens then? In the evidence sessions that I am doing in the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee, it is clear that there is some pull-through and some knitting together of some aspects in relation to clarity. I hear you saying that you do not want to be prescriptive and that you want to be flexible, but I also hear a lot of comments from planners who say that they want clarity. I am concerned about what the process is after the consultation ends on 31 March. This NPF is a draft. When do you expect to bring the final one to Parliament?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
I heard the minister talking about the understanding that all communities are different. However, NPF4 refers numerous times to remote, rural and island communities without acknowledging that there are significant differences between many of those communities. That concern has been raised in a number of the evidence sessions that I have been part of. Many of those communities are facing radically different circumstances. An example is the action area that covers the Western Isles, Orkney and Shetland. The point has been made to me that there are nuances in those areas and that they do not necessarily sit well together in that action area. How will the Scottish Government ensure that the diversity of the different parts of our rural, remote and island communities will be recognised through NPF4 and other policies that it proposes?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much—that was very helpful.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for being so succinct in your response.
I have a question on land assembly. Witnesses, including Planning Democracy and the Scottish Land Commission, have argued that NPF4 goals can be delivered only if the public sector takes a far more proactive role in land assembly and development. Do you agree with that and, if so, what needs to change for that happen? I am not quite sure who to direct that question to. Perhaps witnesses could put an R in the chat if they have a response and I will take a couple of responses.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much for making that pretty crucial point. I will take Pam Ewen, to be followed by Iain McDiarmid and Craig Iles.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for those two important points. We will absolutely take them on board.
I want to thank our witnesses for their evidence. I have had a lot of questions in my mind and we have already taken a lot of evidence, but I feel that this evidence session has really helped fill in some gaps. I am sure that my colleagues have found it very useful, too.
We now move into private session.
11:14 Meeting continued in private until 12:26.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Once again, I am grateful for your specific examples on that point. Lastly, does Sarah Shaw want to come in on that question?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that. It is good to hear that perspective.
We will move on to discuss the minimum all-tenure housing land requirement, on which I will bring in Pam Ewen and then Sarah Shaw, initially. How do you think that the minimum all-tenure housing land requirement will work in practice? Is it clear enough? Will it direct new developments to where they are needed? A supplementary question that has come up in evidence sessions is whether we need to rethink how we do housing in Scotland in general.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
Sarah, did you want to come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2022
Ariane Burgess
I will bring in Mark Griffin, who joins us on BlueJeans.