The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5684 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Witnesses in the previous panel said that there needs to be a joined-up approach across all agencies to tackle climate mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity issues simultaneously. Terry A’Hearn has just talked about SEPA’s more systems-based approach, but are the organisations represented by the panel endeavouring to work together in a joined-up way? If so, could you provide some examples? Secondly, what can the Parliament do to help you to support rural sectors in responding to the climate and nature emergencies?
I am spoiled for choice, but perhaps we can start with Grant Moir, as we have not heard from him for a while.
11:15Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Does anyone else want to come in? In the interests of time, perhaps it could be highlights.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
It is good to hear that innovation is happening.
This question is for Terry A’Hearn. Echoing the findings of the Rural Economy and Connectivity and Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committees in the previous session, the Government’s shared policy programme states that
“the status quo of aquaculture regulation is not an option”
and includes a commitment to
“reform the regulatory and planning framework”.
That has started with the independent review from Professor Griggs, and we are waiting for the first piece of that.
Since SEPA’s responsibilities include managing the environmental impact of fish farms, I would appreciate hearing about your engagement with the review, whether you believe that it will catalyse the regulatory reform that is desperately needed and what else is being or should be done to minimise the impact of fish pollution on the environment and reduce the considerable animal welfare harms across the industry.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
I am keen on the national planning framework 4, and I imagine that all the witnesses, given that they are from public bodies, have engaged with it. It is a crucial tool for achieving net zero in Scotland and ensuring that biodiversity flourishes.
From the witnesses’ responses to Jim Fairlie, we have heard about land use pressures. Master plans, land use plans and spatial mapping have been mentioned. We have a finite amount of land in Scotland, so there are great demands on it for housing, forestry, agriculture, carbon sequestration, renewables, infrastructure and more. There is probably a need for an overarching land use plan for the whole of Scotland, which would enable us to use our land most efficiently and equitably.
Is such work taking place? If not, would that be a useful approach? If so, how much more data and research would be required to develop such a plan? That brings us back to the joined-up approach that we talked about earlier, so I would appreciate it if anyone picked that up.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
My question follows on from the convener’s initial question about policy. I would like to hear whether panel members feel that there is enough support in the current policy environment to ensure a timely and just transition for coastal sectors and communities, to ensure that they can continue utilising our marine and coastal habitats, as new measures are brought in to reduce the impact on biodiversity. What support is needed to ensure a just transition?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
To come back to my question on just transition, is there enough support in the current policy environment to ensure a timely and just transition for coastal sectors and communities? If anyone else on the panel wants to respond to that, I would appreciate it. Also, just chime in if you have read the section on coasts in NPF4.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Would anyone else like to talk about joined-up approaches across organisations?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Yes. I am talking to everybody. I did not address that question just to you, but have you managed to look at NPF4? It is okay if you have not, because a lot of people have not.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that. I would like to hear from the rest of the panel about the specifics of the just transition.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 1 December 2021
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. Would anyone else like to come in on the just transition aspects in their areas?