The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5737 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that very enthusiastic response.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
What is the Scottish Government doing to support training of surveyors and fire safety assessors to ensure that there is a sufficient pool of qualified staff to deliver the single building assessment programme within a reasonable timescale?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Donna Birrell would like to come in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. That is such a stark example. You talked about tender costs being way in excess of your assumptions. Do you have a sense of where those costs are coming from?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for that insight. That is really useful.
Donna Birrell, do you have anything that you want us to hear, or have we heard it all?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for the confirmation. What are the practical implications for developers of the new building regulation 3.28, which requires buildings to be designed to reduce the risks to occupants’ health from overheating, and what impact might the regulation have on home owners’ use of their property?
12:30Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
Thank you very much. Finally, the committee heard calls for greater independent monitoring and assessment of building work through use of clerks of works, which is something that our predecessor committee called for. What is the Scottish Government doing to require or facilitate use of clerks of works?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
I would like the committee to ask the Scottish Government why it has chosen to make permanent changes through regulations 2 and 3(7)(b) and what the
“new approach of targeted inspections using relevant data and improved education and engagement with applicants”
means in practice, including what data the targeting is based on.
The policy note states:
“The 2022 Regulations will have no impact on stakeholders or members of the public as they simply assist and enable officials to carry out controls despite the coronavirus pandemic and related restrictions.”
If the regulations mean that there will be fewer on-the-ground inspections on farms and crofts that have not complied with rules on protecting soil and water quality and environmental protection, is it not the case that they will have an impact on the local environment as well as on biodiversity and the climate and will therefore impact on the public? I would like the committee to ask the Government that question.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
As introduced, the bill requires the Scottish ministers and relevant authorities, when drafting their good food nation plans, to
“have regard ... to the scope for food-related issues to affect outcomes in relation to”
a specified list of high-level outcomes. The amendments in this group speak to the importance of ensuring that we take a whole-systems approach to food policy. It is vital that the good food nation plans cover all the many policy areas that can affect, or can be affected by, food. Accordingly, amendments 73 and 78, in my name, would add “climate change” and
“wildlife and the natural environment”
to those high-level outcomes.
I felt that simply stating “the environment” as a policy area that ministers and relevant authorities must have regard to was too broad and amorphous, and that the addition of climate change and wildlife and the natural environment would help them to focus on how the good food nation plans and the policies in them can make an impact on achieving emissions reduction targets and net zero, tackling the nature emergency and meeting future biodiversity targets.
The other amendments in the group, which were lodged by Jenni Minto, Rachael Hamilton, Monica Lennon and Beatrice Wishart, also seek to make further provision about what ministers and relevant authorities must have regard to when preparing their plans.
Jenni Minto’s amendments 36, 37, 50 and 51 will satisfy calls from stakeholders such as OneKind and Food Train for the inclusion of animal welfare and social care in the bill. I particularly welcome those amendments, as well as the amendments from Rachael Hamilton and Monica Lennon, which seek to include education and child poverty in the list.
I move amendment 73.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2022
Ariane Burgess
I agree with the Scottish Government’s decision, but I would like the committee to ask it to explain how its decision to consent to the provisions being included in the United Kingdom legislation can be reconciled with its stated intention to maintain regulatory alignment with European Union law and the high standards that Scotland enjoyed as part of the EU when the UK is applying to join free trade agreements such as the comprehensive and progressive agreement for trans-Pacific partnership, or CPTPP. According to a House of Lords committee report, that raises concerns about food that is imported to lower standards
“undercutting UK farmers and undermining the UK’s food standards regime.”