The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5714 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
That brings us to the end of our questions. I appreciate the evidence that has been given today. I have circled in my notebook “whole housing cost columns”. That has sunk in, and that is a good thing that we need to take on board. We need to take on board everything that we have heard today.
I suspend the meeting so that the witnesses can leave.
12:25 Meeting suspended.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
The final public item on our agenda today is to consider our approach to the continued petition PE1778, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the Scottish landlord register scheme. It is suggested that we ask the Scottish Government for sight of the draft statutory guidance and for a summary of the changes that it makes to the landlord registration scheme, in order to determine whether that addresses the concerns of the petitioners. Do members agree to the suggested action?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
Willie Coffey has questions on the evictions pause.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
Does Fenella Gabrysch want to come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thank you. Does David Bookbinder have anything to add?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
You said that it will pose issues. What impact will a below-inflation rent increase have on social landlords’ capital investment plans for building new homes and investing in existing stock? What difficult choices will have to be made in that regard?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
We now move on to questions from Mark Griffin, who is joining us online.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
That concludes our questions. Thank you so much for giving us evidence and clarity on what is happening in your sector. I will now suspend the meeting to allow for a change of witnesses.
11:31 Meeting suspended.Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thanks very much. Could we have someone from Living Rent next? I do not know whether you both need to answer that question. I will leave it to you both, throughout the meeting, to choose who answers.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Ariane Burgess
I understand what you are trying to get at in talking about some form of limitation. You said that we need a set of principles to decide which gear could be used where—that is helpful. We are trying to bring back the inshore abundance of fin fish and white fish that used to be there, which could, in the future, bring back a thriving sector.
I am also interested in enforcement. That came up with regard to the previous limit, which you mentioned was difficult to enforce. Given the budgetary constraints and the fact that that historical limit was removed, do you think that we could enforce it? You mentioned that we have much more technology that could help us with that.