The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5737 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 29 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
We have been asking questions about the four objectives of agricultural policy. I come back to the word “regenerative”, and the tensions that my colleague Kate Forbes brought up.
One thing in particular struck me when I was looking at the four objectives. Taking a broad-brush definition of “regenerative”, my understanding of why producers have moved away from talking about sustainable practice is that, given that nature has degraded so much and we are facing such massive issues around meeting our climate emissions targets, simply sustaining our practices is no longer possible, so we need to be doing regenerative agriculture. My understanding of that is that it means practising a form of agriculture that supports the natural environment to regenerate, while meeting human needs.
It is interesting to me that that is set out as a separate thing. I would have thought that regenerative agriculture policy practices would give us high-quality food and lead to nature restoration and climate mitigation and adaptation—you spoke to that a little bit—and would support enabling rural communities to thrive.
I would like to hear a bit about your thinking around regenerative agriculture. I know that you want to keep the objectives broad for possible changes, depending on circumstances in the future, but I want to understand how you see that objective connecting to all the policies that underpin it.
My colleague Kate Forbes referred to sustainable agriculture in a way that implied economic sustainability. We really need to be talking about sustainable and regenerative agriculture in terms of what we are doing for nature restoration and for climate adaptation and mitigation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Thank you for coming in and giving us your evidence on your bill. I align myself with Emma Harper’s thoughts on the amount of work that you have put in to get it this far.
The word “loophole” came up in response to Emma Harper’s question, and I will continue on that theme. The bill provides that young dogs are to be seen with their mother
“unless this is not practicable”,
and my question is about that wording.
A couple of stakeholders raised concerns about that being a loophole and asked for something a bit more specific. What do you think about that? For example, Battersea Dogs & Cats Home suggested using the wording:
“unless this is not practicable for welfare reasons”.
The Dogs Trust suggested that it might apply
“if the mum is deceased”.—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 20 September 2023; c 12.]
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
The bill says that the person who is going to see a puppy has to see it with the mother
“unless this is not practicable”.
What do you think about the suggestion that that needs to be clearer? An alternative suggestion is
“unless this is not practicable for welfare reasons”,
so that we are specific about why it is not possible.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
In a way, you have introduced the bill partly because, although we would think that some of that is common sense, you have discovered that it is not.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
I have a supplementary question that is on microchipping, but it is also about supporting the register. On 20 September, we heard evidence from Libby Anderson, who explained that, although microchipping improves traceability of individual dogs, a register could ensure not only traceability but transparency about and accountability of the breeder. Other witnesses have provided evidence on unscrupulous dealers switching out microchips to falsify where an animal has come from. I have read your letter, Ms Grahame, and hear your possible openness to microchipping. However, if we relied on microchipping for traceability, how could such practices be prevented?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Okay, they are there.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Fergus Walker wants to come back in.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Great; thank you very much. Councillor Lobban, I see that you want to come in but I will move on, because we have a lot of questions. We might cover it or you can tuck in your response later.
This is a question for our council representatives, and it goes back in time, pre-Covid. In 2017, councils gained powers to reduce the council tax discount on second homes. What impact has the change had on the number of second homes in your area?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Fergus Walker, how has it been in Argyll and Bute?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 21 November 2023
Ariane Burgess
Fergus Walker wants to come in.