The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 6674 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
I mentioned this in my question, but I will bring it back into the conversation. Some stakeholders highlighted the idea that we could do more management within forestry plantations, for instance. Are you considering that? If forests were properly manged or better managed, that could help us with our carbon emissions.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Thank you.
11:00
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay—thank you, convener. I will see if I can cobble it together again. I was inspired by Alastair Hamilton’s point that the closure is not doing anything and Robin Cook’s follow-on point that it is not enhancing the stock.
Dr Cook, you said that the closed area is focused on spawning, but you asked whether that is the most effective way to protect spawning stocks. That inspired my question: what else could we be doing?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
I want to dig into that a bit more, and then other people can come in. Are we using the right measure? If we took that measure away, what could we be doing to get us where we want to be—protecting the cod stock?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Do you have clear early warning signs in the plan, as well as the monitoring processes? Is there something in place that would trigger a new plan, or is there anything that would make you think, “That’s a red flag,” or, “That’s a warning sign that we’re not on track”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Okay. The Scottish Agroecology Partnership—SAP—has pointed out that there are not really any opportunities in the forestry farming space for things like hedgerow planting. Are you looking into that?
Also, I remember being at the Royal Highland Show, where the Woodland Trust and others were presenting the idea of having trees on farms. Are we optimising that idea or that direction of travel? There is such an opportunity for farmland—I have been to a monitor farm near Grantown-on-Spey, where the farmer had his cattle grazing through a wonderful, quite old birch wood. Maybe we need to look into that kind of thing.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Does that include continuous-cover forestry? Are you considering that as a possible approach?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
As Tim Eagle touched on the first part of my question, I will move on to the other part of it. He asked about other sources of funding, and you have pointed out that you are looking at private finance. However, Future Economy Scotland warned us in evidence that the private finance market for peatland is “underdeveloped and untested” and that we might be
“delaying action … for an uncertain solution”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 7 January 2026; c 4.]
later on. It also raised the practical point that peatland restoration is largely about avoiding emissions, so the demand for peatland credits might be weaker, and it pointed to, for example, tax-based approaches, zero-interest, income-contingent loans and that kind of thing. Is the Government looking at that, instead of just going for straight-up carbon credits and that kind of approach?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
Is the carbon emissions land tax in that space?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Ariane Burgess
I will come to Dr Cook in a moment, but I will start with Alastair Hamilton.
You said that the closure is not doing anything—in fact, Dr Cook said that it is not enhancing the stock. You said that the focus is a closed area for spawning but asked whether—I am paraphrasing you, because I cannot write that quickly—that is the most effective way to protect a spawning stock. What would another way be? From what I am hearing and from what I have read, this approach is not doing what we need it to do, which is to protect the cod and make sure that we have a future cod stock. What else could we be doing that might be better?