The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5835 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I return to my first question; I want to dig in there a bit more. Why do we need to bring in flexibility? What kind of situation are you imagining where an LDP would need to be amended?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I will make a comment about a concern that I have already brought up in the evidence session. I absolutely want to see environmental impact assessments and I agree with the importance of their connection to a masterplan consent area scheme.
However, as things evolve, I want us to be vigilant and really aware that we might need to readdress EIAs where we start to understand that there is that complexity in relation to biodiversity that we were discussing earlier. We might need to revisit that approach if we see that masterplan consent area schemes are allowing us to run away and not give good enough consideration to what is critical for life in Scotland and life on earth.
The question is, that motion S6M-14815, in the name of Ivan McKee, be agreed to.
Motion agreed to,
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Masterplan Consent Area Scheme (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 [draft] be approved.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
We turn to the final negative instrument. If members have no comments to make about the building regulations, is the committee agreed that we do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Okay, thank you.
We move on to questions on the national planning framework.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful. We have brought in the national planning framework, which is putting biodiversity right up there. I know that it is early days and it is still bedding in, but I see that we have problems at a local level with attending properly to biodiversity. I am hearing about situations in which councils are continuing with old practices around biodiversity that need to disappear. One of my concerns about the masterplan consent areas is that we would have an overarching EIA—although I hear your point that it gets triggered only if certain projects are to occur within that masterplan consent area—but we are not seeing best practice come through around biodiversity.
We could create a situation where we do that blanket EIA and then, down the line, realise that we missed something within that context. Do you see what I mean? I am talking in the abstract—I do not have a specific example because we are in an abstract situation as we start to understand more about our impacts on biodiversity.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
The second item on our agenda is to decide whether to take items 7 to 12 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Good morning and welcome to the 28th meeting in 2024 of the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee. I remind all members and witnesses to ensure that their devices and notifications are on silent.
We have received apologies from Mark Griffin.
I welcome Alexander Stewart and Meghan Gallacher to the committee, and I invite Alexander Stewart to declare any relevant interests.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I just wanted to pick up on the issue of the MCAs. My understanding is that, once the regulations are brought in, the detail itself will be left to guidance. I am a bit concerned about that; as you have said, a 30-day period is longer than 21 days, but we could be talking about quite big areas being covered by different pieces of work. It might not just be housing, but could be housing, roads and other pieces of infrastructure. Indeed, in your opening remarks, you mentioned the green freeports as places where MCAs might be used.
I am just a bit concerned about our passing these regulations and then the detail coming through in guidance. We have already seen the challenges that have arisen from NPF4 being introduced and bedding in, with planners feeling a sense of challenge in ensuring that biodiversity is right up there as a key element of the national planning framework that needs to be considered. I just want to understand that a bit more, because, for me, the problem is that guidance can be changed and is therefore more flexible than regulations.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Okay—so there is even more time, and even more preamble, in a way, for people to get involved.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Could you clarify one point? Is that within the 30-day window?