The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 5780 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Have any local authorities come with specific concerns, for example that they might want housing or something else that they are already aware of?
There has always been a question floating around the committee regarding local place plans. How do we honour them? Would the proposed flexibility allow local place plans to be accepted into an LDP? I know that many communities are working on their plans now, but if a community is slower off the mark, might accepting a local place plan be possible, using an amendment?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
The committee will publish a report setting out its recommendations on the instrument in the coming days.
We now turn to consideration of the motion on the second instrument, the Masterplan Consent Area Scheme (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2024. I invite the minister to move motion S6M-14815.
Motion moved,
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Masterplan Consent Area Scheme (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 [draft] be approved.—[Ivan McKee.]
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
The committee will publish a report setting out its recommendations on the instrument in the coming days.
With regard to the two negative instruments on planning—the Town and Country Planning (Masterplan Consent Areas) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 and the Town and Country Planning (Amendment of National Planning Framework) (Scotland) Regulations 2024—I am minded to reflect on the evidence that we have heard today and bring them back to the committee next week. Are members content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I do not think that anyone is moved to speak.
One of my concerns is that if a local authority designates an area as an MCA and it does the overarching environmental impact assessment, once the development has been decided on—for example, for housing or roads—we could lose that nuance and miss out something in that overarching area.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
The next item on our agenda is to take evidence from Ivan McKee, who is the Minister for Public Finance, on four Scottish statutory instruments. The Minister is joined by Scottish Government officials Kristen Anderson, who is head of development planning; Ruairidh Anderson, who is the senior policy manager; and William Carlin, who is the senior policy manager. I welcome the minister and his officials to the meeting and invite the minister to make a short opening statement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I return to my first question; I want to dig in there a bit more. Why do we need to bring in flexibility? What kind of situation are you imagining where an LDP would need to be amended?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
I will make a comment about a concern that I have already brought up in the evidence session. I absolutely want to see environmental impact assessments and I agree with the importance of their connection to a masterplan consent area scheme.
However, as things evolve, I want us to be vigilant and really aware that we might need to readdress EIAs where we start to understand that there is that complexity in relation to biodiversity that we were discussing earlier. We might need to revisit that approach if we see that masterplan consent area schemes are allowing us to run away and not give good enough consideration to what is critical for life in Scotland and life on earth.
The question is, that motion S6M-14815, in the name of Ivan McKee, be agreed to.
Motion agreed to,
That the Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee recommends that the Masterplan Consent Area Scheme (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 [draft] be approved.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
We turn to the final negative instrument. If members have no comments to make about the building regulations, is the committee agreed that we do not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
Okay, thank you.
We move on to questions on the national planning framework.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 29 October 2024
Ariane Burgess
That is helpful. We have brought in the national planning framework, which is putting biodiversity right up there. I know that it is early days and it is still bedding in, but I see that we have problems at a local level with attending properly to biodiversity. I am hearing about situations in which councils are continuing with old practices around biodiversity that need to disappear. One of my concerns about the masterplan consent areas is that we would have an overarching EIA—although I hear your point that it gets triggered only if certain projects are to occur within that masterplan consent area—but we are not seeing best practice come through around biodiversity.
We could create a situation where we do that blanket EIA and then, down the line, realise that we missed something within that context. Do you see what I mean? I am talking in the abstract—I do not have a specific example because we are in an abstract situation as we start to understand more about our impacts on biodiversity.