The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 674 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 15 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
The public know that the NHS has been under extreme pressure for the past two years. As we hear more about the impact that that is having on staff, is there a risk that that will impact recruitment? How do we persuade people that the NHS, primary care and the sectors that you all work in and represent are still great places to work? How do we continue to attract people into health professions? Could I go to Julie Mosgrove first, please?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
I thank all the panel members for giving us their thoughts. Some respondents to the committee’s survey expressed a pretty negative view of social prescribing. Some said that it was not the type of care that they wanted or expected to be offered when seeking help from their GP. One respondent said that they would be “insulted” if they were directed to those services. Another said that it represented an “easy way out” for the GP.
The benefits of social prescribing are well documented. Does the panel think that the negative attitudes towards social prescribing stem from a lack of awareness of it or explanation of the benefits? Does there need to be a greater culture shift with regard to what care people can expect in accessing their GP?
I will go to Hannah Tweed first, as she is nodding lots.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
I have heard GPs raise another concern about social prescribing, which is that it takes less time to explain a drug prescription than it does to explain a method of social prescribing, such as a nature prescription. Is lack of GP time a barrier to patients understanding and engaging with social prescribing? Are the rationale behind and benefits of social prescribing being properly explained to patients? How can we raise awareness of social prescribing if GPs have limited time to explain it properly?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
Dr Williams mentioned links workers, but, with their limited capacity and the financial strain that people are facing as a result of the cost of living situation, there is concern that much of their time is being taken up with helping people to apply for benefits, as a result of which they do not have as much time to engage with social prescribing. What are the panel’s thoughts on that? Do we simply need more links workers, or should that part of their role be separated out and allocated to, for example, welfare rights advisers in GP practices? Perhaps Wendy Panton can respond first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
Good morning, panel. What do you see as the main barriers to GPs engaging with social prescribing? That question is perhaps for Dr Williams in the first instance.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
This has already been touched on, but I am concerned about the inverse care law. As services come under increasing strain and become more difficult to access because of waiting lists and practitioners having to see more people with more complex issues, and as the system becomes more complicated to navigate, with people expected to self-refer to different services, is there a risk of the inverse care law becoming more entrenched and those with lower levels of health literacy becoming less likely to engage with health services? If so, how can we mitigate that risk? Perhaps Hannah Tweed can answer that question first.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
Thank you, convener. As we have already touched on various issues to do with marketing and sponsorship, I will squish some of my questions together so that we can try to cover everything.
The SHAAP report on alcohol marketing during the six nations championship has been referenced. Do you believe that there should be a full ban on alcohol sponsorship of sport? Given that it can be lucrative and many sports clubs are facing challenging financial circumstances, do you have views on how we can encourage clubs to move away from such sponsorship? Would it be best to achieve a full ban through legislation? If not, what mechanism should be used?
10:45Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 1 March 2022
Gillian Mackay
What are your views on other preventative measures, such as a social responsibility levy on retailers? The Scottish Government has stated that it will take action to improve alcohol labelling. What impact could mandatory alcohol labelling have on alcohol harm? What changes would you like to see in that regard?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Gillian Mackay
I will briefly pick up on something that Donald Macaskill said. For some care workers, there is a lot of recording of visits. It is often to support families in terms of knowing what has happened during visits, but it can be used to try to keep track of workers because of mistrust in them. How do we improve the culture for care workers in particular, as we go forward?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2022
Gillian Mackay
Audit Scotland highlights in its briefing that there is
“No individual social care record in the same way that each member of society has an NHS record.”
It says:
“This makes it difficult to assess whether social care is meeting people’s needs.”
What are your views on the introduction of a single social care record?