The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 738 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 27 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
That is lovely. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
Absolutely. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
That was great. Thank you.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
Do you think there is a tendency for local authorities to go with the default option rather than looking into other more creative ways of providing services? Are they all so stretched across the board that that is standing in the way of their capacity for thinking differently about how they come at things?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
I will go to Ryan Murray first, because you raised in your opening statement the variability of implementation of the different SDS options. How can we raise awareness among older people in particular of the options under SDS? For many families, this might be the first time that they have had to access the care system at all and many—mine included, when we came to that point with elderly grandparents—just took what was offered rather than looking into the other options that were available. What should we do to address that, and the variability of the way in which different local authorities implement different SDS options?
I am very aware that, on the other end of things, for many young people, SDS is also quite difficult in certain local authorities.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
In having the opportunity to do things differently, is there an element that is potentially adding more risk to an already overburdened system by looking at how things could be done differently? Maybe exploring them and giving them a try with certain people is just too much for some social workers, given their case loads when dealing with that, and giving people space is one of the things that can open up creativity across the piece.
09:45Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
Coming back to Ann Marie Penman’s comment about the broad nature of care plans, do you think that there is a willingness to write those plans in a broad way in order to give people the creativity to spend money as they wish? Is that happening in some places and not in others? Is it the luck of the draw, depending on which local authority you are in, who your social workers are and so on?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
Thank you—that was really useful.
I have a somewhat wider question for Dr Nolan. With the previous panel, we discussed variability in implementation of SDS, in particular for different age groups. Does awareness need to be raised about the different options that exist? Again, I highlighted to the previous panel the fact that, for my family, the default provision was a 15-minute visit for an elderly relative; that was what we were given, and we never questioned it. I know that care happens in local authorities in different ways and that some local authorities treat different age groups differently. Does more awareness need to be raised in that respect?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
Would witnesses prefer a levy to take the form of a public health supplement or for it to be a social responsibility levy? What should that revenue be put back into?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 6 February 2024
Gillian Mackay
So far, in talking about a public health levy, we have focused on the big retailers and rateable values. However, in some communities, small shops might be the only ones there, and they will sell alcohol to the community around them. Given that, as you correctly identified, it is the amount that people drink that causes them harm, what is your view on a public health levy being linked to the volume of sales—and, therefore, the harm that a shop might be doing to the community around it—rather than the rateable value of premises?