The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 738 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
I recognise the issue of the cost of acquiring those rights for public sector broadcasters, as I have had conversations with a couple of different broadcasters over the course of the campaign that we have run.
Before Christmas, I wrote to Ian Murray to ask him to put the Scotland games on the prescribed fixtures list. I have yet to receive a reply from Mr Murray. Would such a move help to solve the issue of the cost of acquiring the rights? Is that something that the BBC would support?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Good morning, minister. The statutory instrument summary indicates that both FSS and the FSA have the ability to review authorisations and take action if new evidence raises safety concerns. However, do those agencies currently have the resources to proactively and continuously review emerging evidence, ensure that businesses meet their obligations and enforce compliance effectively? Given that the Scottish Government’s budget outlines a 1.6 per cent cut to FSS funding, how can the Scottish Government guarantee that those critical public health responsibilities will not be compromised?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Accepting the statutory instrument would create further divergence from European Union food regulation at a time when the EU is maintaining rigorous standards. How does the Scottish Government justify that move, particularly given its stated ambition of one day rejoining the EU and the need to align with its food safety framework to do so?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Given that products will no longer be subject to a 10-year reauthorisation process, how will the proposed change make the food environment safer? At the moment, I am hearing that what is proposed will simply speed up another side of the process. It sounds as though resources are simply being moved from renewing authorisations every 10 years to looking at the massive number of new feed additives and so on that will require to be researched. How, overall, will the proposed change make the food environment any safer? Will it not simply shift resource from one side to the other and potentially miss things as a result of continually reviewing evidence rather than having a 10-year regulated framework?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Are there any specific flaws that the witnesses wish to identify in the safeguards against coercion that are set out in the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
I go back to the question that I asked about a whole-family assessment. Do you believe that such an assessment should be done?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
No.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
They are worried that the potential for coercion has become such a big issue that people might think that all disabled people are being coerced into opting for an assisted death. If they decide that they want an assisted death, they want their feelings to be taken seriously, on their merits.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 January 2025
Gillian Mackay
Thank you.