The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 333 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you, minister.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. There has been commentary on the long waiting times for some complaints to be considered. Professor Gill noted that that has
“the potential to ... reduce trust and satisfaction among members of the public”.
Do you think that delays could impact public trust in the complaints system overall? What is your response to that suggestion?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
It could be both. There could be several reasons for a delay—it could be to do with the vast volumes that we have spoken about or the need for further submissions from public bodies in order for an investigation to continue.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. Minister, a number of weeks ago, I submitted a written question to the Government to ask whether the Government would provide an update on how many buildings have been identified as having flammable cladding. The response that I received from you states:
“We have previously estimated that around 350 high-rise and up to 500 medium-rise buildings across Scotland may require assessment and some level of remediation, across all tenure and building ownership types.
We continue to use this data as an outline planning assumption. However, we are working through a number of routes to enhance both the quality and efficacy of our estimate of potentially affected buildings in Scotland.”—[Written Answers, 25 November 2024; S6W-31234.]
That suggests to me that you still do not know how many buildings are impacted with cladding across Scotland. That is really concerning. How can we accelerate the programme of cladding remediation when we still do not know how many buildings have cladding?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
I take your point, but this goes back to the speeding up of processes. You could achieve the work on the 500 buildings and the 350 buildings that are identified in the budget that you have allocated, but then more people could come forward with concerns about cladding on their buildings. How long do you expect this to go on for? Will funding be available until all the identified buildings have been remediated? It will not be a quick fix if you are relying on people to come forward with information for assessments to be carried out. I am trying to get an idea of the scope and the scale of the work, because it will not be a quick fix or a speedy process, as you highlighted earlier.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
To go back to the annual report, it states that only 4 per cent of all complaints that were closed last year went through the SPSO’s full investigation stage, which is a much lower level than was the case seven or eight years ago. Why are so few full investigations taking place? Does that undermine the ombudsman’s job of identifying the systemic improvements that need to be made?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you for that helpful clarification of your processes.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning, minister and officials. Scottish ministers will have the power to set the commencement date for the proposed changes in the Renters’ Rights Bill. Briefly, can you give the committee an update on the timescale that the Scottish Government is considering?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. We have had a really interesting conversation so far. Jan Savage has just picked up on one of the questions that I was going to ask about the role of commissioners, but if anyone else has anything to add on that, please do so.
One submission that the committee received was about the ombudsman and the public complaints system as a whole. We have heard a lot this morning about issues, concerns, accountability processes and perceptions of the ombudsman and the public complaints system. Looking at the rest of the UK, and indeed across Europe, what do you think is the ideal, best-practice scenario that we could use here in Scotland to improve things with regard to the ombudsman as a whole?
I do not know who would like to kick off with that. I know that it is a huge question.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 26 November 2024
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning, Professor Gill and Professor Mullen. Fulton MacGregor has touched on one of the questions that I was going to ask about vulnerable groups and broadening access. Professor Gill said that the ombudsman is more likely to be used by people who are seen as middle class. How do we broaden that? How do we tackle that challenge to make sure that people in more vulnerable groups—I am thinking of female prisoners and younger people—get involved if they have concerns to raise?