The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 533 contributions
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful.
The BS 8414 testing system has been seen as a route to compliance when it comes to cladding. What is the Government’s position on that particular testing model, given that the stark evidence from the Grenfell tower inquiry was that it should not be used as a testing system?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
On that point, Homes for Scotland, the Scottish Property Federation and Scottish Land & Estates say that they do not agree with the building safety levy, so how will you, as cabinet secretary, discuss that and engage with people who are concerned about it, to ensure that those concerns are voiced? In the grand scale of what you are trying to achieve to make buildings safe, £30 million per annum seems quite small.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Cabinet secretary, I am going to probe you further on the timings for the bill. The consultation began on 28 November 2023, but I believe that the Scottish Government started talking about the issue in 2021. That is a substantial amount of time. This morning, we are hearing that there is the warmer homes plan and that nothing will be brought forward until the climate action plan has been completed, but you have had all that time to bring something forward. We have five and a bit months of this parliamentary session left. Is there sufficient time for a committee to scrutinise the bill, for amendments to be considered and for the bill to be brought to the chamber for stage 3 proceedings before the Parliament is dissolved for the election?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Okay. We have heard that the warmer homes scheme has been delayed for several reasons. It was introduced in 2024—I have just looked it up. I understand that you are still relatively new in post, but your predecessors had a sufficient amount of time to bring something concrete to the table. I know that there have been issues, given that you were in coalition but now are not, but there is uncertainty for the sector, which I do not think is fair. Is that a fair assessment—that you must ensure that the sector is coming along with you on that journey and that the uncertainty as to whether a bill will be introduced is not very helpful for it?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful; thank you very much.
I would like to explore what qualifies as a high-risk building over 18m tall that should be remediated or demolished by 2019. I understand that there is a residential element, and I hope that the cabinet secretary can expand on that. I am certainly interested in other buildings that have cladding attached to them, such as hotels, hospitals, boarding schools, hostels and so on. I have tried in the past to gather an explanation or an answer from Government on whether those buildings will be included in the remediation work. Will the cabinet secretary confirm that?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
I accept that, but there is a problem with those particular building types. My concern is that Scotland has still not extended the ban on cladding in order to include such buildings. Is that actively being explored? When will we see an answer on that? For months, I have tried to get a direction from the Government on whether an extension or potential extension of the ban will include such buildings. Does the cabinet secretary agree that such an extension would bring us into line with what is happening in the rest of the United Kingdom?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
That is helpful, thank you. My next question is linked to cladding but also the proposed building safety levy. What is the estimate for the total amount of Scottish Government funding that would be required for evidence gathering, single building assessments, remediation work and future monitoring requirements, and what role would a potential levy play in that, if any?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
Is that a cast-iron guarantee that the bill will come through before the end of this parliamentary session?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Meghan Gallacher
What happens if the UK Government’s plan does not come in?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Meghan Gallacher
I will start with questions on the EPC validity time period. It is proposed that the period will reduce from 10 years to five years. John Blackwood, I hope that you do not mind, but I raised the concerns that the Scottish Association of Landlords has about the reduction with the previous panel. I will put my question to you first. What would you like to see changed in the proposed timeframe? Should we be sticking with 10 years or should we be following the alternative proposal that has been outlined?