The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 418 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
How do you think the victims who have had such crimes committed against them would feel if someone could go through the system, be approved and be able to work with vulnerable groups sooner? There is a risk that the legislation could favour the perpetrator over the victim, in this instance.
09:45Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 8 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I do not have much to add to the debate, but I will touch on one or two points that colleagues made.
I reiterate the point that I am absolutely not scaremongering. The concerns are legitimate. We need to weigh up risks and I am not convinced that the regulations would eliminate the risks that we have spoken about.
Stephanie Callaghan mentioned an assertion that it was all about serious offences. That is not what I said and I think that she has picked me up wrongly. I said that there was a wide-ranging list of offences. That is where another concern comes in. It could be something minimal or it could be something more serious. It is a matter of weighing up what would be approved and what would not be approved. We need to have more discussions about that instead of approving the legislation as is.
I want to touch on the barred list. I understand James Dornan’s point. However, as we heard earlier, 13 out of the 19 applications were successful. That shows that there is a sway in respect of applications being approved. That is okay if they have gone through robust processes, but it adds a further element of risk.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I refer members to my entry in the register of members’ interests: I am a serving councillor in North Lanarkshire.
My question relates to the one about tourism that the convener asked. I have heard concerns that the proposed licensing scheme could have a damaging impact as businesses try to recover from the pandemic. Many businesses rely on tourism at home and the tourism industry to give them a boost. What are the panel’s concerns about the timing of the legislation? What lasting impacts might it have on businesses across the sector?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Before I ask my question, I refer everyone to my entry in the register of members’ interests, which states that I am a serving councillor on North Lanarkshire Council.
My question is about the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characteristics of individual places. How do we protect the character of a community?
My second question is similar to one that Willie Coffey asked earlier. How do we involve communities to ensure that their views are represented in that regard and that there is an element of protection for them? I would like Aaron Hill to answer those questions first.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
The question is about the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characters of individual places. How can we protect the character of our communities? How can we get members of the public and those communities involved so that their views are heard and the communities that they love are protected?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Good morning. You might have heard from my questions to the previous witnesses that I am quite interested in the relationship between retrofitting and protecting the distinctive characters of individual places. How do we protect the character of a community while we retrofit properties, and how do we involve those communities in the planning for retrofitting?
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
It would be good to hear from Derek Logie about the rural perspective, given the make-up of rural communities.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
Thank you.
Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I have no comments to add, convener.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 17 November 2021
Meghan Gallacher
I will leave the Morgan review and the requirements for strengthening ASN provision and move on to Covid guidance for pupils with ASN. I recently read an article by the EIS ASN network, which suggested that Covid guidance is “totally inadequate” for pupils with ASN. One concern that was raised is that, due to the wearing of face masks, ASN children cannot see their teacher’s face, which impacts on their ability to communicate in the way that they usually would. What is the commissioner’s view on the wearing of face masks in schools, particularly across the ASN estate? Does he believe that it has an impact on the ability of ASN children to communicate effectively with their teachers and peers?