Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 616 contributions

|

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Annual Reports of the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

Good morning. First, I understand that 142 complaints have been fully investigated by the ESC in 2024-25. I can probably anticipate what you are going to say, but could you give us more information on the reason for that number of complaints, which has doubled? Could you also give us a bit more detail on the impact on your resource?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Annual Reports of the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

That is helpful. Thank you for clarifying the reasons behind the decision.

There have been two cases where the respondent’s conduct amounted to a breach of the code, but there seemed to be a conflict between the breach of the code and article 10 of the European convention on human rights. What happens in that scenario? Do you anticipate that there could be an increase in the number of such scenarios?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Annual Reports of the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

There is the issue of how you measure the impact of the behaviour, of course, as things can have a different meaning to different people at different times. It is important to bear in mind that, as you outlined in your opening remarks and your answers to members of the committee, although councillors should behave respectfully towards each other, there can be scenarios where tensions are heightened and there could be certain behaviours that are not necessarily representative of the on-going behaviour of the individual and could just be a spur of the moment thing or a one-off instance.

My final question is about what happened last year, when the Standards Commission wrote to the Scottish Government asking for a change in the legislation. Has there been any progress on that or dialogue with the Scottish Government? Do you have further information to share about the change in legislation that you were calling for?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee [Draft]

Annual Reports of the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards Commission for Scotland 2024-25

Meeting date: 25 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

That is helpful, thank you. I think that Parliament will be busy next session, convener.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

That is helpful. Convener, I do not have any further questions on that.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 11 November 2025

Meghan Gallacher

The Scottish Association of Landlords is in favour of retaining the 10-year period, arguing that increased regulation incurs costs, which can then be passed on to tenants. I am trying to gain more understanding as to why the Government has decided to reduce the validity period from 10 years to five years, and, in particular, what impact that might have on private landlords.

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Meghan Gallacher

I hear the point that the cabinet secretary is making, but it is important to say that, if points of principle are not set out and the Government does not clearly set out its intentions—bearing in mind that it has taken nearly two decades for the Scottish Government to get to a point at which it is conducting another consultation on council tax—we could end up in a situation in which a consultation is had but members in the next session of Parliament do not agree and the conversation stops again. Does the cabinet secretary agree that there is a risk of that, given—

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Meghan Gallacher

Thank you, convener, and good morning to our witnesses. I am very interested to hear the witnesses’ views on the ability of local authorities to increase council tax next year as they see fit. Certainly, in the 2025-26 budget for local government, we saw some stark increases; one example is Falkirk Council, which increased its council tax by 15.6 per cent. I am interested to hear views on council tax increases but also on the impact that such increases will have on hard-working taxpayers—both individuals and families. What could be the consequences of increasing council tax, and what impact could that have on individuals in the community?

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Meghan Gallacher

I am sorry, but I had—

Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee

Pre-budget Scrutiny

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Meghan Gallacher

Finally, on statutory services, there is a growing concern that funding for areas that are not directly protected in one way or another will go back to statutory services in local authority areas. You have seen that. You have seen tensions between communities and local government councillors who are trying to balance the needs of their communities with the budgets that they have been given. You will of course be aware that roughly 80 to 85 per cent of funding is given to councils directly by the Scottish Government as opposed to being what they can generate from council tax increases. Are you concerned about that? Do you understand that it could generate an increase in complaints to councils in future years if local government is not given a fair funding settlement?