The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2911 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
It was.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
I explicitly asked the witnesses who have come before the committee whether they want UKIMA to be repealed. You can look at the official record; it is very clear. We can swap quotes from the Official Report if you want. I can tell you, having sat through all those meetings, that businesspeople in Scotland appreciate the legal certainty that UKIMA has given to them.
I will move on to a different issue, which is the effect of UKIMA on the ability of devolution to work and there being an opportunity to create innovation. To consider what the academic experts told us, I will share a couple of quotes from Professor Chris McCorkindale, who is an adviser to the committee, which the cabinet secretary would perhaps like to comment on. Professor McCorkindale said that UKIMA
“does not impose new legal limits on devolved competence”
and that it simply ensures that devolved laws do not create barriers to trade. Angus Robertson just said that we agree that there ought not to be new barriers and that we want to have frictionless trade across these islands, and that is what Professor Chris McCorkindale of the University of Strathclyde said.
Professor McCorkindale went on to say that the effect of the act is “practical” and that Scottish legislation is
“enforceable only against goods and services in Scotland”,
rather than those coming from elsewhere in the United Kingdom. There is nothing unreasonable about that—that is what the effect of UKIMA is.
I have another quote somewhere from David Thomson of the Food and Drink Federation, who said:
“we do not necessarily observe that the internal market act has had a chilling effect”.—[Official Report, Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee, 27 March 2025; c 4.]
He was referring to devolved policy making and innovation in policy at the Scottish level.
The problem with Angus Robertson’s position is that he does not accept the nature of the unitary state of the United Kingdom. His position—that the United Kingdom Parliament should not be able to create legislation that gives legal underpinnings to the internal market—is the fundamental stumbling block. I have presented academic and legal opinion that clearly defies everything that he has said this morning.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
I just believe that you have created—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
You are disputing that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
I see, fair enough.
There is a necessary element of goodwill. You talked about goodwill at the beginning of the meeting. You expect the Labour Government to do your bidding. You want it to repeal the act, but the act is not going to be repealed. It is acknowledged in evidence that legal underpinnings for the single market are essential. Common frameworks are not a choice. You can have legal underpinnings and you can definitely have common frameworks.
We have not talked about intergovernmental relations, but given the written evidence that we have and what we have heard from the cabinet secretary this morning, I really do not have any more questions.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Stephen Kerr
They do not want it repealed.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
I suppose that that is a by-product of government and bureaucracy: a lot of things get caught in the weeds.
David, do you want to add anything about that seat at the table? If common frameworks are being worked up but you are not involved, that seems a bit odd.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
Marc and Mags, has David Thomson reflected what you think?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
Is there a bigger role for the office for the internal market? It seems to me that you think that it is a pretty good thing but that its potential may be unfulfilled.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 March 2025
Stephen Kerr
That is good.