The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3239 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
Are we still at red?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
At the very least, though, the cabinet secretary should have acted to ensure that a substitute accountable officer was in place, but we still do not have that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
Okay. I have one final question, which is a continuation of the discussion about the current state of the organisation. I have perhaps dwelt for too long—I do not know—on the accountable officer, but that seems like one of the crucial issues coming out of the section 22 report. There is also the issue of internal financial controls in relation to things such as the 400 purchasing cards, which seems an extraordinary number in an organisation with, if I remember correctly, 1,200 employees. What has changed in the past month in relation to the issues that you highlighted that relate directly to internal controls?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
I appreciate that we are short of time and I have taken up a lot of time. I am grateful to my fellow committee members for allowing me that indulgence, but I should probably stop there. Thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
Could it be? Would that be possible? Would you be able to do that?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
I very much appreciate that. One whistleblower told me—this individual is known to me and is genuine—that they were genuinely concerned that, one day, someone at work or a visitor would be injured or worse. Obviously, we do not want that to happen. That is why I am raising the issue at the end of this session, as well as the failures that result from the “culture of non-compliance”, which runs pretty deep in the organisation and has done for a while.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
May I ask the Deputy First Minister some very quick questions and go through a number of different issues very quickly, just to tie up some loose ends?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
Right. I presume that there must be a number, because people inside Scottish Enterprise know that there will have to be redundancies on the basis of a third year of real-terms cuts.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
I have some quick questions on employment. Do you have statistics on the employability funds and programmes that you have cited a few times this morning?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Stephen Kerr
Excellent.
I turn to the Scottish child payment, in relation to which I have frequently raised a concern about the cliff edge that exists when it comes to encouraging people to take promotions, salary increases or different jobs. There is a cliff edge in the sense that, at a certain point, they will lose all their benefits if they do that. That acts as a disincentive for people with regard to employment. Is that a concern for you? If it is, what discussions have you had internally with a view to moving away from having that cliff edge?