The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2676 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Let us see whether we can agree on something else, then. Turning to productivity, do we agree that it is the single most important driver of growth, living standards and public service funding?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
Which is what is needed.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
On that point, we have a particularly difficult problem in Scotland in relation to business investment. Our business investment percentages are among the lowest in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. I want to hear, from a Scottish Government perspective, what we are going to do differently to change that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
I am getting a signal from the convener. We could talk about this for a very long time, because there is so much to unpack on innovation-active companies. The problem that we have with technology in Glasgow as a major city is that it is below all the averages in all the areas that make a difference to local and national productivity. However, we do not have time to go into that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
There have been a number of excellent reports that explore these paradoxes, but we in Scotland are not unique in that respect, hence the importance of our looking further afield and taking those lessons. Some of those lessons will be quite uncomfortable about the nature and structure of our economy, and how we perhaps have to be prepared to rearrange those structures to help us become more prosperous. I am sure that you agree with some of that.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
If not the top. Right—so we kind of agree on that. How much money does this area of your portfolio spend? How much have you got? It is about £1 billion, is it not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
In the economy brief.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
There is a churn in the life cycle of businesses. One area that could boost our economy and productivity where we have not done very well is the creation of new businesses. Roughly, over a 10-year period, we are creating new businesses at less than half the rate in the rest of the United Kingdom. That will have a negative impact on our ability to be a productive economy. What do you put that down to?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
I am looking at it over 10 years.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 October 2025
Stephen Kerr
It has been shown that that is a very difficult nut to crack.
The Government is spending money to try to drive productivity, which I think is the key economic driver, but we are not making headway. When we consider the budget, we ask ourselves about the issues and the problems with value for money. Clearly, we are not getting the £1 billion bang in this area. What is your analysis?