Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 15 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2715 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

You have had a conversation with Petroineos, and it is important for my constituents to hear that that commitment from it is on the table. Is that commitment on the table or not?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

It would be highly credible if you, as a minister of the Crown, were able to say that you had had a conversation with a private business in relation to project willow—which it commissioned: Petroineos was the commissioner of project willow, even though it was paid for by public money. It would be very helpful to hear you say that Petroineos is committed to making all the nine potential projects happen on the land that it owns. You do not seem to be able to say that, and I find that somewhat concerning.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

That costs money, of course. We are trying to de-risk the process so that investors will come forward with the propositions. They all carry massive risk, whether that lies in the land or in the supply chain. There are a whole bunch of issues here that create uncertainties that we need to minimise.

I think I have said enough.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

There are lots of questions about the nine potential projects—on feedstock, biodiversity, food security and the whole supply-chain set-up, which we do not have time to look into today.

I will ask the minister one final question—and I do appreciate the opportunity to ask the minister these questions, convener.

The official said that the £25 million from the Scottish Government was more readily available to use for seedcorn investment. Why is the £200 million from the National Wealth Fund not more readily available for that kind of activity? That is the kind of activity that might give pace to the projects right now.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

There are lots of questions about those projects—although I see the convener is giving me the eye.

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

Minister, although I am not a member of the committee, I am grateful to the convener for allowing me the opportunity to ask a question. I was a little perturbed by the answer that you gave to Michelle Thomson about the position of Petroineos in relation to its role as a landowner and a landlord.

I was particularly perturbed by what I picked up as a discussion that you have apparently not yet had with Petroineos, about its willingness to fulfil its part in all this, which is to make that land available in a state that it can be properly developed. Did I pick you up wrong, or are you saying that that is not a discussion that you have yet had?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

I completely understand the secondary sales aspect. That is part of the fixture for concerts and games, is it not? I just think that it looks very odd, frankly. We have this whole thing about touting and then in the middle it says that UEFA can effectively bypass all that. I understand the intention but question where it sits in the bill, in connection with touting. That is my take on it.

There are similar issues with the selling of tickets under section 3. I understand the point about charities. However, many good causes would benefit from a charity auction of a ticket that are not registered charities. I am thinking, for example, of local hospitals or schools. Was there any consideration of the charitable dimension in section 3?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

Yes, it would be useful to have as much information about that as possible. Might there be similar legislation coming from the UK or Welsh Governments? Will it prevent someone from touting a ticket in Carlisle, just on the other side of the border, for the games in Glasgow?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

Flags, yes. Metal badges are also very popular. What is the real and substantial risk? It seems strong-handed; I think that it is strong-handed.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

UEFA European Championship (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 May 2025

Stephen Kerr

This is my last point, because there are so many issues. It is good that you are here and it is good that you are being so up front with your answers.

Patrick Harvie mentioned issues of enforcement. There is a bit in section 24 of the bill that I could not understand. That might be because I am not a lawyer, but it might be because the whole idea of people forcibly entering premises without a warrant feels really foreign to me. In relation to the merchandise issue that George Adam referred to, section 24(2)(b)(i) says that no warrant is needed if

“the constable reasonably believes that there is a real and substantial risk that delay in seeking a warrant would defeat or prejudice the purpose of taking action”.

In the context of policing, if an officer perceives that there is a risk to life, then they may enter any premises. That is understood. Unless I am not understanding the logic, what is the real and substantial risk of someone having a bunch of scarves or hats? I do not quite get that. [Interruption.] What is the other one?