The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2911 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
It is perceptive that you say that, because central to the Dunlop review was the secretariat but also a dispute resolution mechanism.
I will ask the others to comment on the Dunlop review. To me, we now have a structure, but we do not have frequency of meetings, we do not have train tracks and we do not have a rail timetable. What we have is a schematic outline of something that happens when someone decides somewhere that we will have a meeting. That does not seem terribly satisfactory if we want a joined-up and mature process of intergovernmental working.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
You mention Canada, and I am sure at the forefront of consideration—you can see this in the review that Dunlop produced—was the idea that there ought to be a rewiring of Whitehall. You started off talking about the Whitehall conundrum and the one week a year when it has a devo focus, whereas devolution has transformed our constitutional working arrangements, which means that the wiring is out of date in many instances in Whitehall, and so is the culture.
I appreciate that I will run out of time, convener. Rachel, would you like to comment? Then we can hear from Hedydd.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
I understand that a dispute is currently going through the mechanism—I had not been aware of that until this week.
Hedydd, do you have any final comments on the issue of Dunlop, the secretariat and the dispute resolution?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
Thank you all for taking on my questions.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
I put it to you that they are not meeting very regularly. I have the numbers here. Some of these committees have met only once, including—astonishingly—the interministerial group on UK-EU relations. We have to be careful that we do not get caught up with the surface veneer of what we are being told. In reality, nothing has changed.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
Thereby hangs a tale. We have a system and a structure. It is looking through a glass darkly, to use a biblical phrase. Can we go to Hedydd Phylip? I hope that I am pronouncing your name properly, Hedydd.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
If they can agree anything.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
I am one of those colleagues whom Patrick Harvie identified as not trusting Governments. I believe that we need strong parliaments and transparency, which is why the language around the reset interests me. We are almost repeating the messages that the Labour Government is giving about an improvement in tone when the actual output evidence, based on the number of meetings that are being held within the structure, including the two meetings that have been held of the council of the nations and regions, suggests that there is more rhetoric than reality.
Can I have a quick around-the-table on the reset and what it means? No long answers are required, because I think that I already know the answer, but I would like to hear it from you, as academics.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
Is there not a context to be considered here? Previous Governments, since 2016, were dealing with two epoch-type events with inadequate structures—hence the political crises that followed intergovernmental relations at every twist and turn. Brexit, of course, led pretty much to a breakdown of relationships between the Governments at times, and the other event was the pandemic. We are not in those situations now and we have structures, but the structures seem to be very loose.
You said earlier—I am not sure that I agree with this, but I am happy to quote it back to you—that informality is the modus operandi of our constitutional working. In fact, if you look at the work of a UK minister or even a Scottish minister, there is not a lot of informality about what they do. Everything is recorded—everything that they do and every meeting. The same formalities do not exist in these structures, even without the crises-making context of Brexit and the pandemic.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Stephen Kerr
I agree with the use of the phrase ad hoc, because that is exactly what we have. We have a form of structure but not actual structure, and we have ad hocery, which is how we seem to do everything.