The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2406 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
This is my last point, because there are so many issues. It is good that you are here and it is good that you are being so up front with your answers.
Patrick Harvie mentioned issues of enforcement. There is a bit in section 24 of the bill that I could not understand. That might be because I am not a lawyer, but it might be because the whole idea of people forcibly entering premises without a warrant feels really foreign to me. In relation to the merchandise issue that George Adam referred to, section 24(2)(b)(i) says that no warrant is needed if
“the constable reasonably believes that there is a real and substantial risk that delay in seeking a warrant would defeat or prejudice the purpose of taking action”.
In the context of policing, if an officer perceives that there is a risk to life, then they may enter any premises. That is understood. Unless I am not understanding the logic, what is the real and substantial risk of someone having a bunch of scarves or hats? I do not quite get that. [Interruption.] What is the other one?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Continuing on the same topic, under section 2(4), why are UEFA officials exempt from the touting offence? I understand about secondary markets and that UEFA might want to set up one of those officially. I get all that, but on touting, why on earth would someone who works with or for UEFA be able to stand outside Hampden and tout a ticket while the guy who lives along the road in Mount Florida cannot do that? I do not understand that.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Okay. There is quite a lot to unpack just in that bit of the bill. Do not get me wrong: I am delighted that we have the tournament coming to the UK, to Scotland, but some things stick in the throat. UEFA is a profit-making organisation that is clearing part of our country out so that it can profit without restrictions. That covers removing all normal Scottish outdoor trading organisations, such as the burger vans and so on, from the area. That sticks in the throat somewhat because the bill does not suggest to me that those businesses will be compensated in any way. The big match days are probably their big revenue days; it is like the black Friday of their business every time there is a big game at Ibrox, Parkhead or Hampden. The bill says that they will be moved to other places, and that might not be anywhere near the crowds that they want to sell their products to, so they will not make the same money. There is nothing in the bill about compensating them. Just to pre-empt your answer, you know that my next obvious point will be to say that the compensation ought not to come from the public purse but from UEFA.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
I have a few points that I want to clarify. I agree with Keith Brown: some of this feels very heavy-handed to me. Perhaps it is just about how you see things, but it feels that way. I know that George Adam has maybe taken a different view. For example, in section 7, charities cannot shake a tin outside a venue for a good cause. Why is that felt to be a threat to the commercial might of UEFA?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
It can be, though, can it not? Section 3(2)(b) permits
“a body outwith Scotland, England, Wales, Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland”,
to do what I am suggesting for a local hospital or a playgroup—something that is not a registered charity. That would include the Isle of Man, Jersey and the Channel Islands. It seems to me that we are being particularly harsh towards organisations that are not registered with OSCR, but which are definitely charitable—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Good morning. It is very exciting to have a major global sporting event happen right on our doorstep. We are all very supportive.
However, a number of aspects of the bill deserve scrutiny. Will you explain the ticket touting elements? Will the bill prohibit ticket touting in Scotland only? I am thinking of schedule 1, which seems to suggest that the provisions of section 2 about ticket touting apply to the territory of Scotland only, that it will be quite possible for tickets to be sold—touted—outside of Scotland and that the provision of information society services, or ISS, can be done online. How will we police that, or is it outside the reach of our considerations?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Are we allowing police officers to do things that they would not normally do, other than in the case of a real and substantial risk to life?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Of course, that was a slightly different event. I think that your information would be very useful because the point will no doubt come up again as we continue to scrutinise the bill.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Of course, that is the whole point of this. I appreciate that. The significant thing, as I understand it from the 2020 legislation, is there was not one conviction.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
That is useful to know. I note that busking is also there.