The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2406 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
So, are you totally satisfied that there is a commitment on the part of Petroineos, as the landowner and as a landlord, to redevelop that land, or is there some doubt about its intention?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
You have had a conversation with Petroineos, and it is important for my constituents to hear that that commitment from it is on the table. Is that commitment on the table or not?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
It would be highly credible if you, as a minister of the Crown, were able to say that you had had a conversation with a private business in relation to project willow—which it commissioned: Petroineos was the commissioner of project willow, even though it was paid for by public money. It would be very helpful to hear you say that Petroineos is committed to making all the nine potential projects happen on the land that it owns. You do not seem to be able to say that, and I find that somewhat concerning.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
That costs money, of course. We are trying to de-risk the process so that investors will come forward with the propositions. They all carry massive risk, whether that lies in the land or in the supply chain. There are a whole bunch of issues here that create uncertainties that we need to minimise.
I think I have said enough.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
There are lots of questions about the nine potential projects—on feedstock, biodiversity, food security and the whole supply-chain set-up, which we do not have time to look into today.
I will ask the minister one final question—and I do appreciate the opportunity to ask the minister these questions, convener.
The official said that the £25 million from the Scottish Government was more readily available to use for seedcorn investment. Why is the £200 million from the National Wealth Fund not more readily available for that kind of activity? That is the kind of activity that might give pace to the projects right now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
There are lots of questions about those projects—although I see the convener is giving me the eye.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Minister, although I am not a member of the committee, I am grateful to the convener for allowing me the opportunity to ask a question. I was a little perturbed by the answer that you gave to Michelle Thomson about the position of Petroineos in relation to its role as a landowner and a landlord.
I was particularly perturbed by what I picked up as a discussion that you have apparently not yet had with Petroineos, about its willingness to fulfil its part in all this, which is to make that land available in a state that it can be properly developed. Did I pick you up wrong, or are you saying that that is not a discussion that you have yet had?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
I completely understand the secondary sales aspect. That is part of the fixture for concerts and games, is it not? I just think that it looks very odd, frankly. We have this whole thing about touting and then in the middle it says that UEFA can effectively bypass all that. I understand the intention but question where it sits in the bill, in connection with touting. That is my take on it.
There are similar issues with the selling of tickets under section 3. I understand the point about charities. However, many good causes would benefit from a charity auction of a ticket that are not registered charities. I am thinking, for example, of local hospitals or schools. Was there any consideration of the charitable dimension in section 3?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Yes, it would be useful to have as much information about that as possible. Might there be similar legislation coming from the UK or Welsh Governments? Will it prevent someone from touting a ticket in Carlisle, just on the other side of the border, for the games in Glasgow?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Stephen Kerr
Flags, yes. Metal badges are also very popular. What is the real and substantial risk? It seems strong-handed; I think that it is strong-handed.