The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2200 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Absolutely—the cudgels will still be there to be picked up.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Ruth has summed it up nicely.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
That is a fair point. Ruth’s summary captures the sentiment of everyone who has spoken.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
That brings the public part of the meeting to an end. I ask members to reconvene on Microsoft Teams in a few minutes. Come to think of it, there is no one on Teams. We will consider our final items in private. I wish those who are watching proceedings a very good afternoon.
12:00 Meeting continued in private until 12:28.Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Good morning, and welcome to the 12th meeting in 2022 of the Education, Children and Young People Committee.
The first item on our agenda is an evidence session as part of our Scottish attainment challenge inquiry. We will take evidence from representatives of local authorities. I am delighted to welcome to the committee room Ruth Binks, who is the director of education, communities and organisational development at Inverclyde Council; Gerry Lyons, who is the head of education at Glasgow City Council; Tony McDaid, who is the executive director of education resources at South Lanarkshire Council; and Mark Ratter, who is the director of education at East Renfrewshire Council. Good morning to you all. I think that this is the first time in the sixth session of the Parliament that we have been able to have all our witnesses with us in the committee room, which is wonderful. You are making a little bit of history today. I thank you for your time.
I will begin with a couple of straightforward questions. We have often heard it said that the additional funds that have come through attainment challenge funding have been used to plug gaps that have arisen because of cuts that would otherwise have had to be made because of the reduction in central Government funding for local government. How do you react to that? Is there a case for saying that that has happened? Is it still happening? Let us start by hearing from Ruth Binks.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
It has always been used for additionality, Gerry. Is that what you are saying?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
That is very clear.
Tony McDaid, how about South Lanarkshire?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
Let me stay with you, Tony. You know Greg Dempster.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Stephen Kerr
This is what Greg told us recently:
“When the funding in a school or an authority goes down, some of the PEF might not really be additional, depending on our definition of that. It might be used to prevent a reduction in staffing or in what is offered in the school. A school that is to lose a couple of support staff because of a change in funding or policy in the authority might use PEF to retain those staff because it knows that it needs them to make a difference and that losing them would have a negative impact.”—[Official Report, Education, Children and Young People Committee, 20 April 2022; c 15.]
Is there anything in what Greg Dempster says that bears out your experience in South Lanarkshire?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Stephen Kerr
The next instrument for consideration is the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2022. Do members have any comments on the instrument?
As members have no comments on the instrument, does the committee agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to it?
Members indicated agreement.