The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2186 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Stephen Kerr
Are we talking about, say, demand-led apprenticeships? I am just trying to work through what you have said, because I did not really grasp it. Are you saying that there will be more demand-led apprenticeships so that businesses can have cash following their apprentices into the college system? Hugh Hall, the principal of Fife College, was very specific about this in his evidence to us, saying that there were “constraints and bureaucracy” that were obviously costly and time and resource consuming. Could there be a reduction in the constraints and bureaucracy that Hugh Hall referred to? Could there even be some latitude in the form of borrowing? Could colleges borrow to support their expansion in order to fulfil the local demand that you have just described? What is your response to those questions and comments?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2022
Stephen Kerr
What other flexibilities have already been offered to the colleges, and what menu of possible further flexibilities have you and your officials worked up? I must ask you to be specific about that, minister, because it would be good to get that information out in the public realm.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
The topic is apprenticeships. I was impressed that Margot Black introduced that topic earlier. Can we hear from Wendy Brownlie and Carrie Lindsay about what their councils are doing in relation to offering childcare practitioner modern apprenticeships?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
I think that you are referring to their parents. [Laughter.]
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
That would be very useful, and I think that we all agree with that.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
I would like you to answer the question. My question was about your personal engagement and what the PVI sector has told you about the conditions that it faces.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
Largely, I tend to agree with Graeme Dey on this matter, and I, too, pay tribute to the petitioner, whose tenacity, perseverance and courage in pursuing the issues is to be commended by all of us.
However, I share the petitioner’s concerns about a lack of a statutory underpinning. I also have growing concerns about what is happening in our schools not just in terms of restraint and the other issues covered in this petition, but in terms of assaults on teachers. The lack of reporting is a growing concern for me.
I think that the only way that reporting measures can be adequately supported is if they are in law. That is why the rest of the United Kingdom is going down that particular route and making it a legal duty to report. That would give us a sounder basis for assessing how the guidelines—which are to be welcomed—will be used and how they will be adhered to. I also think that it gives a basis for the cabinet secretary, Scottish ministers and the Scottish Parliament to be able to assess whether the approach is working.
Therefore, I am happy to support what Graeme Dey has suggested, but, when we write to the cabinet secretary, I would like the issues that have been highlighted by the petitioner and the issues that I am focused on to be included in that letter.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
You mentioned it: an annual check-in with some quantitative and qualitative information behind it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
I was going to say that, if it really was a market, it would be first in the queue to be investigated by the Competition and Markets Authority. Frankly, if you think that it is a market, let me disabuse you of that idea. It is not a market, because the local authorities are the funders of the private sector and their competitors. As a result, there is undoubtedly a drift that is beyond anecdotal—for example, in relation to staff, the private, voluntary and independent sector believes that it recruits and trains people and gives them experience, and then the local authority comes along and hoovers them up because it offers them such better salary terms.
I want to ask about your engagement with the PVI sector. Does it tell you similar things to what Willie Rennie and I have said in our questions? I will go first to Carrie Lindsay, then to Wendy Brownlie.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Stephen Kerr
I seek the convener’s guidance. I respect the fact that the authorities that are represented before the committee are—I understand this from PVI partners across Scotland—among the best reputationally for some of the things that we are talking about, but I would like to hear from Stewart Westwater what Fife Council’s PVI partners are saying to the council.
Part of the important reflection that we need to make here is about what the sector is telling the council, because it is the funder and a competitor. We need to hear those partners’ voices, but we will not hear them in this evidence session unless our witnesses reflect to us what they have told them.