The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 899 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
I am happy to pass that question to the relevant people.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
I can have a go. Where there is a lack of information and/or evidence explained in the financial eligibility form 2, SLAB can use its discretion to disregard income or capital where it considers it reasonable to do so in the circumstances or to provisionally assess financial eligibility based on the information that is available. Solicitors must explain those situations when making an application to ensure that SLAB is aware of why information might be missing and to avoid the application being rejected or abandoned. As a result of being in an abusive relationship, someone might have accumulated several debts. When calculating someone’s eligibility, SLAB will consider disposable income and debts such as loans, credit cards and store cards and it will make an allowance for the monthly payment towards those debts, but that is not unique to domestic abuse cases—
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
Absolutely. You are right to raise that issue.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
That is a good question. There are two main strands to the work to increase accountability for human rights under the bill. The first involves establishing an approach that shares human rights leadership and responsibility among several bodies. We therefore propose expanding the powers and remits of a number of bodies, including the Scottish Human Rights Commission, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman and other oversight bodies. Our hope is that that will strengthen their ability to provide accountability and support for human rights in Scotland.
10:15The second strand of the work involves developing measures that will enable courts and tribunals to deliver effective and appropriate remedies when it is found that a duty bearer has failed in its duty under the bill regarding protected rights. Before the summer, we will publish a discussion paper that will set out in greater detail our approach to policy in the bill.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for that. I understand what you are getting at, and you have covered a lot of areas there.
To be very clear, the Scottish Government procures certain services from organisations, including in the third sector, and they are monitored. There is day-to-day funding governance through Inspiring Scotland, and third sector bodies are covered by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, so there is thorough scrutiny and governance.
At this time, there are certain groups of people, including transgender people, who are feeling particularly vulnerable. I have had questions from you about some of those organisations before. For instance, we fund a suicide helpline; the funding is there to provide a service that people need in order to be able to deal with mental health issues regarding their protected characteristics. We procure specific services in that regard, so it is not a question of funding any particular type of ideology.
I will bring in Cat McMeeken to give a little bit of further detail.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
To give you a specific answer and make sure that we get it technically correct, I will pass that on to Cat McMeeken.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
I am not sure that I have the scope to do that. We have a robust process—there is an accountable officer involved and Inspiring Scotland are the people who do that impartially; they have that impartial judgment. Perhaps Cat McMeeken can explain how that actually works.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
You said it very well. You will be fully aware that the plan will be all of those things, but the most important thing is embedding a human rights approach across everything. That is the cultural change that has to happen, which is why I talked about participation, consultation and collaboration, which are really important. It will involve not just the Scottish Government in that sense, but public bodies and a wide variety of stakeholders. It is important for that approach to be embedded from the get-go, so that that is the starting point. We need to take people with us in order to do that.
The tracker tool will be open and available to the committee and members of the general public. It will be able to track the progress that is being made across all the duty bearers. It will provide accountability, transparency and tracking, which is to be welcomed. It is not just a tool for us; we will not be marking our own homework. It is a tool that is available for everyone to use to hold us to account as well as everyone else who is responsible for the implementation of those rights.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
There was a meeting on 30 April about the Supreme Court judgment. However, I was not privy to that, so I think that it would be fair to pass that question to Cat McMeeken.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Kaukab Stewart
I am sorry, but I missed the end of that.