The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 885 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
The word that I was thinking of was “pragmatic”. It is a pragmatic way forward but we realise the complexities of it. Can you give an example of any unintended consequences of the process? You alluded to possible legal challenge. Could you go into that a little bit more?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thanks very much. We will move to questions from Karen Adam.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Did you have any involvement in the preparation or development of the amendments?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Our second agenda item is to take evidence on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill at the reconsideration stage. We will take evidence from two panels of witnesses this morning.
I welcome our first panel. Nicola Killean is the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; Gina Wilson is head of strategy in the office of the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland; Juliet Harris is director of Together (Scottish Alliance for Children’s Rights); Jan Savage is executive director of the Scottish Human Rights Commission; and Fiona Menzies is a policy manager at the Law Society of Scotland.
I refer members to papers 1 and 2.
Before we begin our questioning, I invite each of the witnesses to make some brief opening remarks, should they wish to do so.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you. I am always impressed by the clarity of children’s thoughts and how they can bring them alive through visual aids and storytelling.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is great—thank you.
I take it that Fulton MacGregor has no further supplementary questions, so I will bring in Maggie Chapman.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you. Karen, did you want to ask anything further on that?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
If no one else wants to come in, I just want to say on behalf of the committee that we have found this to be a very useful session. I think that we have managed to get under the skin of some of the areas of contention to ensure that we move on at pace while also providing a very thorough scrutiny process.
We all appreciated the way in which Juliet Harris brought alive the children’s voices in such a practical way through the image of the spider’s web. From our point of view, we want to ensure that that web is robust so that in the future, when we add on all the bits that will strengthen children’s rights, we have a framework—a web—that is robust enough to carry them.
I agree that children are well able to understand complicated concepts regarding their own needs, wants and rights. When I was a teacher prior to being elected and we were doing rights-respecting schools, the articles in the UNCRC and so on, I could see that children were well able to express—not only orally but through pictures and multisensory play—their knowledge of all the different articles. In one sense, it appears that they were well ahead of us adults and that the legislative process is just catching up with them.
In that spirit, then, I thank you very much for your contributions this morning. Your evidence will certainly add to our scrutiny.
I suspend the meeting very briefly to allow for a change of panels.
10:55 Meeting suspended.Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 October 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I bring in Fulton MacGregor, who is online.