The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 875 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for that. I want to ask another small question, though I am mindful of the time and the fact that there are still two colleagues I need to bring in.
In your written evidence, Naeema, you say with regard to the Law Society’s dual role:
“there is a risk of conflict and bias, as a result of the real possibility of injustices being done, both for the professional and the public.”
Can you give an example of what that risk would look like?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you. That concludes consideration of the regulations.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
If it is a very small question with a very brief answer.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Thank you for that. I call Annie Wells.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
I will just come in on the back of that. Professor Mayson, you have views on the experience of independent regulation in England and Wales, so I am just going to take a bit of time to give you an opportunity to go into that a wee bit further. How have the issues of cost of a new regulator and independence of the legal profession been dealt with in England and Wales?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
That is excellent. You have pushed your colleague forward. Brian, will you have a crack at answering Karen Adam’s question?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
In an earlier answer you referred to the consequences of the referral of the bill to the Supreme Court. Apologies for taking you back a little bit, but I wanted to ensure that you had every opportunity to put any other consequences on the record.
We have talked about coverage and the delay, but we also heard last week from young people who understand somewhat the delay in getting it right. They have waited this long, so they are generally supportive. Are there frustrations that you would like to share with us just now? How have those frustrations been mitigated with regard to the amendments?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
We move to questions from my colleague Meghan Gallacher.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Speak through the chair, please. Sorry—I am bringing order to this. I will allow you to continue, professor.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee
Meeting date: 7 November 2023
Kaukab Stewart
Agenda item 3 is our second evidence session on the Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill. I welcome to the meeting Brian Inkster, chief executive officer of Inksters Solicitors; Chris Kenny, former chief executive of the Legal Services Board of England and Wales and currently CEO of the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland; Professor Stephen Mayson from University College London; and Naeema Yaqoob Sajid, solicitor and director of Diversity+. Welcome to you all.
I refer members to papers 2 and 3. I note that the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee is taking evidence on the bill this morning from the Minister for Victims and Community Safety.
I invite each of the witnesses to make some brief opening remarks should they wish to do so, starting with Brian Inkster.