The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1473 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 24 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
That concludes our public business for today.
09:02 Meeting continued in private until 10:01.Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I wish a very good morning to everyone, and I welcome you to the 12th meeting in 2023 of the Social Justice and Social Security Committee. We have received apologies from Katy Clark for today’s meeting.
Our first item of business is a decision on whether to take agenda items 3, 4, 5 and 6 in private. Do members agree to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 11 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Our next item of business is consideration of a negative Scottish statutory instrument.?The instrument makes amendments to working age and pension age regulations as a result of the introduction of the Bereavement Benefits (Remedial) Order 2023 in February.
The 2023 order allows for cohabiting parents with dependent children who need support following the death of their partner to qualify for Department for Work and Pensions bereavement benefits. Previously, only bereaved parents who were married or in a civil partnership could qualify for those benefits. The order also allows retrospective claims to be paid as a lump sum in some circumstances, and it will prevent such a payment from affecting entitlement to or eligibility for a council tax reduction, which would normally be dependent on a person’s capital.
The instrument is laid under the negative procedure, which means that its provisions will come into force unless the Parliament agrees to a motion to annul it. No motion to annul the instrument has been lodged.
As members have no comments to make on the instrument, I?invite the committee to agree that it does not wish to make any recommendations in relation to the regulations. Do members agree to note the instrument?
Members indicated agreement.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
Will the member take an intervention?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have no further comments. I will not press amendment 67.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I will not move it, convener.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
No.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
I have had time to reflect on my amendment and to seek further advice, and I have decided that I will not move amendment 52. However, I will keep an eye on how the issue develops at stage 3.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 10 May 2023
Collette Stevenson
When I initially lodged the amendment, I thought that I would like to see section 5 removed. I have now done more groundwork on the issue and have looked further into it. I have serious concerns—especially in relation to public safety and victim safety—about cases of domestic abuse and sexual violence where bail and release involves the use of electronic monitoring. Although that is a restriction of liberty, that restriction might be for only nine hours or so, which means that victims of domestic abuse or sexual violence would still be at risk of coercive behaviour or harassment.
I still have huge concerns and, although I will not move amendment 67, I will seek more help from the cabinet secretary on the issue. Particularly in cases of violent crime, bail should not involve electronic monitoring but should be commensurate with the crime.
I will not move amendment 67, but I seek movement on that section of the bill. [Interruption.]