The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 957 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Elena Whitham
If the bill were enacted, how might it align with any future human rights bill in Scotland? The proposed human rights bill has been delayed and will not be enacted during this parliamentary session. The current Scottish Government has promised that it will tick over into the next parliamentary session and that it will be lodged then. I am interested in understanding how this bill might align with a Scottish human rights bill.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Elena Whitham
The last area that I will look at is the enforcement of rights. Thinking about the current situation rather than a hypothetical one, although we do not have a crystal ball, let us assume that a Scottish human rights bill will be lodged in the next session of the Parliament. I would be interested to hear what steps the Scottish Government is taking to ensure that people who experience substance use are able to realise their existing rights in the absence of this bill, as it is proposed, and in the absence of a Scottish human rights bill that would underpin and make those rights enforceable. We hear that people are not always able to realise the treatment that they seek in their local areas. Right now, there is an enforcement gap in the system, as people are not able to challenge decisions effectively or do not know the routes that are open to them.
12:15Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Elena Whitham
Yes.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Elena Whitham
I have a final question on this. At the moment, how are individuals able to challenge the treatment that they receive or that they are not receiving but would like to receive? What redress do they have just now? How do they realise their existing rights in domestic law?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 May 2025
Elena Whitham
That is helpful.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Elena Whitham
The first part of my question is about your views on the Scottish Government’s decision not to include a non-regression clause in part 2, but we have already heard your views on that quite clearly. Are there alternative approaches to framing the powers that you would like to see in the bill? For example, would you like things such as protection for certain aspects of the core aims of the regimes or a requirement for additional consultation, scientific input or, indeed, parliamentary scrutiny of changes that could arise? In the absence of a non-regression clause, would there be other ways to consider the powers in the round and to start to curtail where the powers could go? Alternatively, you could just come back and tell me your views on the absence of a non-regression clause.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Elena Whitham
The second point that I was going to come back to is about expertise. The issue is not just about capacity in terms of resourcing but about the individuals who undertake work in closer-to-shore activity in the marine space, especially those who work for local authorities. We are thinking about high-energy waters and trying to understand how a site could work in that space. Is there the expertise for that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Elena Whitham
My original question was around the resourcing of local authorities to undertake that work. It was interesting to listen to Professor Tett outlining the issue around the wider strategic planning and how that could work in practice in regional partnerships.
I do not want to stray into other members’ lines of questioning, but I am interested to understand what Elspeth Macdonald thinks about that. Obviously, spatial conflict would arise, but it is about the complexity of how a local authority would undertake the assessment of what could operate beyond the 3-nautical-mile mark. How would that impact on your organisation and members?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Elena Whitham
As a former chair of a council planning committee, I understand how the system works, although I did not have marine in my planning authority. I can think about it in terms of being on a planning committee during the proliferation of wind energy and understanding that from its beginnings and as it expanded rapidly, with the planning committee members and officials having to increase their knowledge base rapidly. It is important to look at it in that respect, because the local authorities are not coming from a standing start. They have knowledge, but how do we ensure that, if this goes forward, they have knowledge beyond their current capacity as well as expertise that they can draw on to make the best decision in a very busy space? I guess that was what I was trying to get at.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Elena Whitham
Thank you. I think that accountability and implementation will be big topics this morning.