Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1211 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Elena Whitham

Good morning to everyone. I am interested in understanding what is happening from a policy coherence perspective—for example, ensuring that we are not operating in silos. Sarah Cowie from the NFUS has already touched on that. I would like to understand what needs to be considered in relation to the alignment of nature targets with the targets and policies in other areas to ensure that we are being effective and that we are providing regulatory certainty. We also need to be able to be fleet of foot to address things as they arrive.

Who wants to comment on that first? I have heard several comments this morning about consistency and alignment.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Employment Rights Bill (UK Parliament Legislation)

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

COSLA’s submission says that COSLA would request that all directly employed local government employees in the sector be removed from the scope of any negotiation arrangements. How would that work in practice? Thinking about the parity of esteem and everything that has been sought, could removing local government employees working in social care from the negotiations work? What would be the consequences? I know that from COSLA’s perspective it is about the job-matching processes in local authority areas. Could we explore that a bit?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

Thank you.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

Good morning. I am interested in exploring some issues relating to the “National Collaborative Charter of Rights for People Affected by Substance Use” that was developed by the national collaborative and everyone who played a part in it. More generally, I am also interested in the enforcement of individuals’ rights and how all that interplays with the bill. The cabinet secretary will be very aware of the launch of the charter of rights, which states:

“Once the proposed Scottish Human Rights Bill becomes law these internationally recognised rights”

as set out in the charter of rights

“will also become enforceable in our tribunals and courts”.

Evidence from the Scottish Human Rights Commission noted that some of the rights that the charter of rights sets out are not yet enforceable in domestic law, because they have not been incorporated, while Audit Scotland noted that people are still facing significant barriers to getting support. We know that that is due to stigma and limited access to services in rural areas, for example. How would the bill as set out complement the charter of rights for people who are affected by substance use, or could it come into conflict with it?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

If the bill were enacted, how might it align with any future human rights bill in Scotland? The proposed human rights bill has been delayed and will not be enacted during this parliamentary session. The current Scottish Government has promised that it will tick over into the next parliamentary session and that it will be lodged then. I am interested in understanding how this bill might align with a Scottish human rights bill.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

The last area that I will look at is the enforcement of rights. Thinking about the current situation rather than a hypothetical one, although we do not have a crystal ball, let us assume that a Scottish human rights bill will be lodged in the next session of the Parliament. I would be interested to hear what steps the Scottish Government is taking to ensure that people who experience substance use are able to realise their existing rights in the absence of this bill, as it is proposed, and in the absence of a Scottish human rights bill that would underpin and make those rights enforceable. We hear that people are not always able to realise the treatment that they seek in their local areas. Right now, there is an enforcement gap in the system, as people are not able to challenge decisions effectively or do not know the routes that are open to them.

12:15  

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

Yes.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Right to Addiction Recovery (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

I have a final question on this. At the moment, how are individuals able to challenge the treatment that they receive or that they are not receiving but would like to receive? What redress do they have just now? How do they realise their existing rights in domestic law?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Employment Rights Bill (UK Parliament Legislation)

Meeting date: 20 May 2025

Elena Whitham

That is helpful.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Elena Whitham

The first part of my question is about your views on the Scottish Government’s decision not to include a non-regression clause in part 2, but we have already heard your views on that quite clearly. Are there alternative approaches to framing the powers that you would like to see in the bill? For example, would you like things such as protection for certain aspects of the core aims of the regimes or a requirement for additional consultation, scientific input or, indeed, parliamentary scrutiny of changes that could arise? In the absence of a non-regression clause, would there be other ways to consider the powers in the round and to start to curtail where the powers could go? Alternatively, you could just come back and tell me your views on the absence of a non-regression clause.