The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2160 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I completely understand the logic behind amendment 75, and I can see where the member wants to go with it but, rather than put that measure in the bill, would it not be better to leave to others the decision on where the marketing happens? The committee’s stage 1 report asked the Scottish Government
“to maximise its marketing expertise”.
We should allow the marketing to be done by the people who know how to do it, rather than the committee.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Either.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Will the member take an intervention?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
The amendment that you are talking about would impose a specific new approach. It has not been consulted on in any detail during the progress of this bill, and it raises a lot of complex issues that would require much more detailed consideration. This bill was never intended as a vehicle for a microchip database reform in the first place; it is not the place in which to do that. However, we are already working on getting the UK Government’s co-operation on that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Again, I push back on the idea that we are simply having friendly chit-chats. I reiterate that we are restarting the monthly meetings between the Scottish Government and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, which have been sorely missed, given the previous UK Administration’s reticence to engage. Those meetings are starting tomorrow—the new Government is engaging with us, which will allow us to take the UK system forward.
I reiterate that this is not the bill in which to introduce new legislation on microchipping. It is a bill on the welfare of dogs, and we are addressing the issues stage by stage. I think, therefore, that the amendments that we are discussing are not in the right place.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
The amendments in this group concern the scope of the code of practice. Amendment 6 will make a minor clarification to avoid any unnecessary confusion about the scope of the code. The code should apply to all persons in the legal sense, whether individual people or legal entities such as companies and partnerships. The present wording, which includes the phrase “for people”, might be taken as restricting the meaning to natural persons only, so it is proposed that “for people” be removed to avoid any uncertainty.
Amendments 8, 18, 29 to 31, 35 and 37, which are in my name, will standardise the terminology that is used in the bill by making it refer to “transferring” a dog rather than the mix of terms that are currently included in the bill.
11:00Amendment 17 defines “transferring” as including
“selling, giving away, exchanging, bartering or arranging for the long term loan or long term fostering of a dog”.
That is an inclusive definition, so any arrangement that would in effect be a transfer of a dog would be caught by the code of practice. Again, that is aimed at preventing people from arguing that they are not covered by the code.
I move amendment 6.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I am happy to have discussions with the member.
Amendment 64, by agreement, withdrawn.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
Will the member take an intervention?
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 18 September 2024
Jim Fairlie
I have nothing further to add.
Amendment 19 agreed to.
Amendments 20 to 26 moved—[Jim Fairlie]—and agreed to.