The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
You raise the important point that the bill brings to the surface some of the fantastic work that is being done but is not documented, so people do not know about it. In effect, creating the plan will let us see where we are. There is a lot of conversation about how bad public procurement is in local authorities, but we might be doing a hell of a lot more than we realise, and the plans will bring that to the surface.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
That emphasises the point that I was trying to make, which is that some local authorities might be starting from a very low base and then we will have authorities such as East Ayrshire that are starting from a very high base. We cannot start the process for every local authority at the same point.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 9 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I have a little supplementary on that. George Burgess suggested that the electoral cycle would ensure that elected members would be held to account. That is not the case with health boards and I think that there is an issue there. It is difficult to hold health boards to account to ensure that their plans are right.
I go back to scrutiny. You suggested that we perhaps did not need a new body. Are you suggesting that local authorities could have an obligation to consult with other bodies? For example, on inequalities, you would go to a body, which could be Food Standards Scotland, to scrutinise how your plan addressed inequality? Does there need to be a requirement for local authorities to do that? Do all the bodies need to play a role?
Jayne Jones, I would like you to answer that question. It was something that you touched on.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
If I have time for one more quick question, I would like to know where we are on long Covid, in terms of our understanding of it, the effect that we are having on it and how we are treating it.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
That is exactly my point. I contest the view that The Sun article that quotes Professor Hugh Pennington is a fair way for the public to get that message, because they will hear “professor” and think, “He must know what he’s talking about,” but he is a professor of bacteriology.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
The point that I am making is on messaging. We get the daily figures from the Government on the number of infections, the number of deaths and the number of people in intensive care units. It is clear that we have a problem with backlogs in cancer diagnosis and cancer treatments. I have spoken at the committee before about the heartbreak of some of my constituents. In relation to Government messaging, what would be the effect of starting to publish every day how many people were diagnosed with cancer, how many people are diagnosed with heart disease, how many people had had a stroke and how many deaths were caused by each of those illnesses? Would that make people less concerned about approaching the NHS to get themselves checked? I hope that we will start to catch up on some of the latent disease that is clearly lying in the community.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Thank you.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Could I come in before you go to Professor Leitch? I do not dispute the fact that the Government has put that data out there, and I do not dispute that the Government has modes of allowing people to understand what is going on, but every day we talk about Covid deaths and hospitalisation. It is clear that that has created a behaviour in our society that says, “Covid—we must react to and deal with that.” We do not have the same level of reaction to cancer or any of the other diseases that kill people in large numbers every year in Scotland. My question is, do we need to change our behaviour to get the community to say, “This is as dangerous or more so than Covid”? It is about changing that message. If we presented daily figures and said, “This is the number of people who died of cancer today,” it might have the same effect.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
My colleague Alex Rowley has quoted Hugh Pennington twice. He is a highly regarded emeritus professor of bacteriology. We have had advice that improving ventilation in schools could be as easy as cracking open a door. If the Government was looking for advice on how to maximise the ability to keep ventilation right, would it go to a professor of bacteriology?
10:30COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 3 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I am awfully glad that you clarified that prior point—I am probably more cautious than normal.