The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
Sorry—I want to come in on that. Surely it would not be viable for us to have that level of staffing at all times in order to cope with a potential peak.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I know. Given where we are in the pandemic, what is the World Health Organization’s advice on testing?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
The point that I am trying to get to is this: how do we surveil to ensure that, if a virus is moving about in our community, we catch it as early as possible? We know that the current system is sufficient. Will what we are moving to be sufficient?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 24 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I reiterate what Mr Whittle has just said: the message that came across clearly this morning was that you cannot follow a patient regardless of where they are—the information does not follow them from one department to another. My understanding was that it could go right across the country but, from what we heard this morning, that is not the case.
There are so many things that I would like to talk to you about.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
As you have pointed out, cabinet secretary, there is, in all the vast amounts of evidence that we have taken, no fixed view on whether there should be an oversight board. In fact, views are very much mixed. On 3 November, George Burgess said that the Government could look at the matter again, and you have just committed to doing that in light of the Bute house agreement. However, would it not be preferable for Parliament to be the scrutinising body instead of—dare I say it?—an unelected quango that would be established at huge cost to the public purse to have oversight of something so fundamental to Scotland’s future good food plans?
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I take the point about flexibility, but I emphasise the fact that we have to get local authorities to implement the measure.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
I would have thought that, given the bill’s breadth and scope, any body that was set up would have to be a substantial one. Surely we already have mechanisms in place to carry out that function.
10:30Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
You have committed to doing that.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
That is the important bit.
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Meeting date: 23 February 2022
Jim Fairlie
In the past, local authorities have been given funding and they have used it exactly how they would want it to be used. East Ayrshire is the most obvious example, but I had better not forget my colleague Jenni Minto’s Argyll: she is very proud of the fact that Argyll and Bute Council is doing so well. Will the Government provide something that says how the plans need to be set out? Public authorities have been given money before and have not done it, so how do we ensure that they do it this time and make it happen?
We heard in evidence that it will be far harder for people in Glasgow to set out a plan that will get them up to standard than it will be for people somewhere such as rural Perthshire. I presume that the Government will have some way of saying what it requires authorities to do. Is that correct?
09:45