Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2089 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I whole-heartedly agree with Mr Mason.

Murdo Fraser has just said that, by and large, the people of this country follow the rules or guidance but I recall that, in the chamber earlier this week, Sandesh Gulhane opposed the wearing of masks, saying that most people do not wear them properly anyway. I do not see the consistency in the message. Right now, given the numbers that we have, it would be crazy to do anything other than keep the possibility of using restrictions if we need them.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I want to go back to Murdo Fraser’s original question about access to GPs and the hybrid model. Last week, I asked our witnesses whether we should give people the understanding that the hybrid model will be the way in which they see their GP in future. One response that I found interesting—I apologise, but I cannot remember the name of the lady who said it—was that it would very much depend on how the patients accept it, or words to that effect.

You say that we are going to proceed with the hybrid model. Does the Scottish Government have to do a messaging job to get people to understand that? How will you put people’s minds at ease about how they will be seen going forward?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Okay. I genuinely take your point, but I am asking these questions. We are also talking about people’s perception of where we are with the virus. You spoke earlier—quite rightly—about people seeing omicron as being okay because it is milder, and you want to flip that view around. However, it seems to me that taking away testing adds another layer of complacency to people’s thinking.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Okay—thank you. Do I have time to ask about outbreak management, convener?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Mr Swinney, Alex Rowley asked whether testing will continue to be free for people, and you said yes. However, John Mason then asked whether people will have to pay for it after April. I am confused by your answers. Have I picked them up wrongly?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

In April?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Having listened to all the evidence, can I conclude, then, that we clearly still have a major problem with the disparity between richer and poorer areas, because the health inequalities are still there; that the service, once a person got into it, was actually as good as it was prior to the pandemic; that we might have to change the way in which primary care is delivered; and that our screening levels have to get back up at least to where they were before—if not to a better level—to allow us to get out of the current situation? Is that a fair assessment of what you have told us today?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

I want to go back briefly to Murdo Fraser’s question to Dr Perez-Reche about patients either being unable to access a doctor or choosing not to go to a doctor, because of a belief that the NHS could not allow it. What is your understanding of that? You seem to be saying that although the data is not definitive, it supports the view that the period from diagnosis to death is shorter as a result of people not seeing their doctor. I hate to be so blunt, but, unfortunately, that is what I am asking about. Is there no way of telling from your data whether death could have been avoidable had the period between diagnosis and treatment been shorter? Is that correct?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Excess Deaths Inquiry

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

My apologies.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Coronavirus (Recovery and Reform) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 March 2022

Jim Fairlie

Excellent. That is of great importance. Thank you very much.

A person is entitled to change a named person at any given time, but, if they are having an episode in hospital for instance, the named person would stay until the episode has passed. Is that correct? I think that you have just answered that.