The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2089 contributions
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I whole-heartedly agree with Mr Mason.
Murdo Fraser has just said that, by and large, the people of this country follow the rules or guidance but I recall that, in the chamber earlier this week, Sandesh Gulhane opposed the wearing of masks, saying that most people do not wear them properly anyway. I do not see the consistency in the message. Right now, given the numbers that we have, it would be crazy to do anything other than keep the possibility of using restrictions if we need them.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I want to go back to Murdo Fraser’s original question about access to GPs and the hybrid model. Last week, I asked our witnesses whether we should give people the understanding that the hybrid model will be the way in which they see their GP in future. One response that I found interesting—I apologise, but I cannot remember the name of the lady who said it—was that it would very much depend on how the patients accept it, or words to that effect.
You say that we are going to proceed with the hybrid model. Does the Scottish Government have to do a messaging job to get people to understand that? How will you put people’s minds at ease about how they will be seen going forward?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay. I genuinely take your point, but I am asking these questions. We are also talking about people’s perception of where we are with the virus. You spoke earlier—quite rightly—about people seeing omicron as being okay because it is milder, and you want to flip that view around. However, it seems to me that taking away testing adds another layer of complacency to people’s thinking.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Okay—thank you. Do I have time to ask about outbreak management, convener?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Mr Swinney, Alex Rowley asked whether testing will continue to be free for people, and you said yes. However, John Mason then asked whether people will have to pay for it after April. I am confused by your answers. Have I picked them up wrongly?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 17 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
In April?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Having listened to all the evidence, can I conclude, then, that we clearly still have a major problem with the disparity between richer and poorer areas, because the health inequalities are still there; that the service, once a person got into it, was actually as good as it was prior to the pandemic; that we might have to change the way in which primary care is delivered; and that our screening levels have to get back up at least to where they were before—if not to a better level—to allow us to get out of the current situation? Is that a fair assessment of what you have told us today?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
I want to go back briefly to Murdo Fraser’s question to Dr Perez-Reche about patients either being unable to access a doctor or choosing not to go to a doctor, because of a belief that the NHS could not allow it. What is your understanding of that? You seem to be saying that although the data is not definitive, it supports the view that the period from diagnosis to death is shorter as a result of people not seeing their doctor. I hate to be so blunt, but, unfortunately, that is what I am asking about. Is there no way of telling from your data whether death could have been avoidable had the period between diagnosis and treatment been shorter? Is that correct?
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
My apologies.
COVID-19 Recovery Committee
Meeting date: 10 March 2022
Jim Fairlie
Excellent. That is of great importance. Thank you very much.
A person is entitled to change a named person at any given time, but, if they are having an episode in hospital for instance, the named person would stay until the episode has passed. Is that correct? I think that you have just answered that.